Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (620.4 files/s, 39754.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 6 114 139 233
Markdown 2 43 0 121
TeX 1 7 0 69
YAML 2 2 4 36
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 12 166 143 460
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
48 Jin
2 Rong Jin
1 Andrew Huang
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 is OK
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 is OK
- 10.1101/081257 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj.2584 is OK
- 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 988
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot set main as branch
Done! branch is now main
@editorialbot check repository
@editorialbot set dev as branch
Done! branch is now dev
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (568.0 files/s, 52556.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 10 302 433 608
Markdown 2 37 0 92
YAML 2 2 4 33
INI 1 9 32 19
SVG 2 0 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 17 350 469 754
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
44 Jin
3 Rong Jin
1 Andrew Huang
Paper file info:
⚠️ Failed to find a paper file in https://github.com/ncezid-biome/HMAS-QC-Pipeline2 (branch: dev)
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot set sample_base as branch
Done! branch is now sample_base
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (652.7 files/s, 62614.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 10 292 422 592
Markdown 2 37 0 92
YAML 2 2 4 33
INI 1 9 32 19
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 16 340 458 737
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
42 Jin
3 Rong Jin
1 Andrew Huang
Paper file info:
⚠️ Failed to find a paper file in https://github.com/ncezid-biome/HMAS-QC-Pipeline2 (branch: sample_base)
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@jinfinance thanks for this submission. Unfortunately, given the small size and limited functionality offered, this submission does not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria. Hence we will now proceed to reject this submission.
Note that this conclusion does not mean the work is not useful or of a poor quality, it merely means it is not in scope given the small size.
We do hope you'll consider JOSS for any future (re)submissions of a more substantial magnitude.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jinfinance<!--end-author-handle-- (Rong Jin) Repository: https://github.com/ncezid-biome/HMAS-QC-Pipeline2 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): sample_base Version: v1.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jinfinance. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jinfinance if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: