Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.48 s (331.4 files/s, 33488.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 6 0 15 3882
CSV 14 0 0 3609
Markdown 45 1007 0 1916
Python 44 1115 1864 1782
HTML 39 0 0 539
YAML 8 30 39 190
TeX 1 7 0 59
JSON 1 0 0 8
TOML 1 0 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 159 2159 1918 11991
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
396 paucablop
22 Pau Cabaneros
13 dependabot[bot]
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1209
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@paucablop<!--end-author-handle-- (Pau Cabaneros López) Repository: https://github.com/paucablop/chemotools Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.3 Editor: !--editor-->@bmcfee<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @vinayak2019, @Kastakin Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@vinayak2019 & @Kastakin, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @bmcfee know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @Kastakin
📝 Checklist for @vinayak2019