[PRE REVIEW]: Collegium: A dashboard to help community colleges find peer institutions

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Mperk78<!--end-author-handle-- (Mark Perkins) Repository: https://github.com/MPerk78/collegium Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/799bde6f51f83e11eed1a0ddbfcee5e5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/799bde6f51f83e11eed1a0ddbfcee5e5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/799bde6f51f83e11eed1a0ddbfcee5e5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/799bde6f51f83e11eed1a0ddbfcee5e5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Mperk78. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Mperk78 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (385.1 files/s, 161467.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         3            208              0           1000
TeX                              1             46              0            423
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             4            254              0           1423
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    15  Sean Field
    11  MPerk78

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 944

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/BF00976187 is OK
- 10.1002/ir.37019875303 is OK
- 10.1023/A:1007089728061 is OK
- 10.19030/ajbe.v5i3.6994 is OK
- 10.1002/ir.37019875306 is OK
- 10.1002/ir.37019875307 is OK
- 10.1002/he.290 is OK
- 10.1002/ir.20031 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Census.gov
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DT: A Wrapper of the JavaScript   Library ’DataTab...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: knitr: A General-Purpose   Package for Dynamic Rep...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: dplyr: A   Grammar of Data Manipulation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Welcome to the tidyverse
- No DOI given, and none found for title: data.table:   Extension of ‘data.frame‘
- No DOI given, and none found for title: readxl:   Read Excel Files
- No DOI given, and none found for title: shinydashboard: Create Dashboards with ’Shiny’
- No DOI given, and none found for title: shinyWidgets: Custom Inputs Widgets for   Shiny
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Shiny - Welcome to Shiny
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ipeds: Integrated postsecondary education data sys...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: tidycensus: Load US Census boundary and attribute ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RODBC: ODBC database access
- No DOI given, and none found for title: questionr: Functions to make surveys processing ea...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of m...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: FactoMineR: A package for multivariate analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Quality Initiative \textbar Accreditation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Identifying peer institutions: Creating a utilized...
- 10.1177/009155210202900401 may be a valid DOI for title: Identification and assessment of community college...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The seven comparison states: Their selection, use ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Association for Institutional Research
- 10.1002/ir.37019833806 may be a valid DOI for title: The politics of comparing data with other institut...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Establishing Peer Groups: A Comparison of Methodol...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Aids to Navigation: Using Interinstitutional Datab...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: In search of peer institutions: Two methods of exp...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Using IPEDS data for selecting peer institutions
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Selecting peer institutions: A hybrid approach
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Peer institutions
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Peers, aspirants and competitors: Developing a set...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Program-level peer selection in benchmarking costs...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Using the IPEDS Peer Analysis System in Peer Group...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Forming and Using Peer Groups Based on Nearest Nei...
- 10.1002/sem3.20043 may be a valid DOI for title: A mixed methods approach to institutional peer and...
- 10.34315/apf1322013 may be a valid DOI for title: A Case study to examine peer grouping and aspirant...
- 10.34315/apf1422017 may be a valid DOI for title: A case study to examine three peer grouping method...
- 10.34315/apf1432017 may be a valid DOI for title: Constructing a peer institution: A new peer method...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: IPEDS Access Databases

INVALID DOIs

- None

[MPerk78]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @MPerk78, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[MPerk78]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[MPerk78]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[MPerk78]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[MPerk78]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

👋 @MPerk78 - Thank you for your submission to JOSS. After reviewing with the larger editorial board, we have to reject this submission for the following reasons found lacking in the substantial scholarly effort requirements:

• Outside of scope to classify as scientific research software
• Low lines of code count
• Code presented in a markdown file instead of a format that would promote reuse and testing

Best wishes.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.