Open editorialbot opened 4 weeks ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1029/jb089ib06p04077 is OK
- 10.1088/0959-5309/58/6/312 is OK
- 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90028-5 is OK
- 10.1029/jb089ib06p04137 is OK
- 10.1144/petgeo2018-161 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-52414-2 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- 0.1098/rsta.1921.0006 is INVALID
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.83 s (64.1 files/s, 340826.0 lines/s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 1 400 4463 221510
C# 30 3276 12796 28948
XML 13 33 144 5552
C# Designer 1 7 852 2959
MSBuild script 3 0 23 364
Markdown 2 68 0 135
TeX 1 6 0 57
Visual Studio Solution 1 1 1 45
YAML 1 1 4 18
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 53 3792 18283 259588
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
99 michael-welch00
53 JointFlow
2 Mikael Lüthje
2 Simon Oldfield
1 Mikael Luthje
1 joint
1 mend-bolt-for-github[bot]
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 937
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: Apache License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@JointFlow<!--end-author-handle-- (Michael Welch) Repository: https://github.com/JointFlow/DFMGenerator Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v2.2.2 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@CBenghi<!--end-reviewers-list-- Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@CBenghi, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @diehlpk know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@CBenghi, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist