Closed editorialbot closed 3 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.29 s (696.0 files/s, 424496.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 86 0 1585 111339
C/C++ Header 50 471 1193 3063
MATLAB 29 440 803 1840
C++ 32 358 392 1292
TeX 1 17 0 124
Markdown 2 40 0 103
CMake 1 11 4 97
YAML 1 0 5 30
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 202 1337 3982 117888
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
141 Aravind-Sundararajan
85 AspectWaltz
38 Varun Joshi
3 Aravind Sundararajan
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1423
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @Aravind-Sundararajan, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/16M1062569 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008493 is OK
- 10.1002/cnm.3777 is OK
- 10.1098/rsif.2019.0402 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010466 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223 is OK
- 10.1186/s12984-023-01279-5 is OK
- 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Optimal control gait simulations of older adults p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Optimal Control Simulations of 3-D Walking in Huma...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: mexplus
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate preprint
:page_facing_up: Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list :page_facing_up:
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor
@Aravind-Sundararajan thanks for this submission. I will be the editor for this submission. I will soon start looking for reviewers. If you'd like to suggest reviewers that is fine/helpful. You can mention their GitHub handles here but leave out the @ symbol so they are not tagged.
For the moment, can you:
Hello @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, thank you for taking the time to do this pre-review.
As for DOIs, Mexplus is a project hosted on github, and the other two references are conference abstracts for presentations at podium or posters.
I have edited the authors list so the affiliations spell out United States of America.
I have also gone ahead and updated my readme and added the COC and CONTRIBUTING files. Let me know if there is anything else I can do here.
As far as reviewers, am I allowed to suggest people who did not yet volunteer? My thinking was to suggest users on OpenSim
@Aravind-Sundararajan great looks like an improvement.
@chrisdembia @cvhammond @marcopus @Ipuch @Modenaxe @aaa34169 @moorepants @nickbianco @jimmyDunne would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
Thank you for considering me for the review of the submission. I am unable to participate as I do not have access to a MATLAB license at the moment. This limits my ability to thoroughly evaluate the software.
Regards, Pierre
I apologize, I don't currently have the bandwidth to review right now. Please feel free to continue to tag me in these posts as I may have time in the future.
Seems like a great contribution @Aravind-Sundararajan! Unfortunately, I also do not currently have the bandwidth for a review. Also, I am still actively developing Moco, so a review from me seems like a bit of a conflict of interest.
sorry, i am not avalaible for any extra reviewing so far.
@chrisdembia @marcopus @Modenaxe @moorepants @jimmyDunne would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
Sorry but I have to decline, I lack bandwidth and to be fair I'm long out of the musculoskeletal simulation field.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman May I suggest 0todd0000 and dhruv.gupta@kuleuven.be?
@chrisdembia @Modenaxe @moorepants @jimmyDunne @0todd0000 @jorandevet @johnjdavisiv
would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
@Aravind-Sundararajan apologies for the delays finding reviewers so far. It seems many are preoccupied. Some searches via email also turned up empty so far. I will keep at it though so we'll hopefully be able to move on soon.
Sorry for the delay. Yes, I'd be pleased to review!
@editorialbot add @0todd0000 as reviewer
@0todd0000 added to the reviewers list!
@chrisdembia @Modenaxe @moorepants @jimmyDunne @jorandevet @johnjdavisiv
would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
Unable to do a review at this time, but thanks for the thought. Gluck
@jimmyDunne no worries, thanks for getting back to me. Do you know of anybody else that I should invite?
@chrisdembia @Modenaxe @moorepants @jorandevet @johnjdavisiv
would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I have been sending emails. How about dgupta7 (dhruv.gupta@kuleuven.be) I suggestested above or aasadi1 (azarangasadi@yahoo.com)
@dgupta7 @aasadi1
would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco".
JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.
If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
Hi Kevin,Sure, I can help with the review.Regards,AzarangOn Aug 12, 2024, at 05:35, Kevin Mattheus Moerman @.***> wrote: @dgupta7 @aasadi1 would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS: The Journal of Open Source Software, the title is: "MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco". JOSS reviews happen here on GitHub and focus on the software as well as a short paper. More on our review process can be found here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you are interested please let me know here, thanks!
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@editorialbot add @aasadi1 as reviewer
@aasadi1 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7110.
Hi Kevin,
Yea, I am happy to review.
Regards Dhruv Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2024, at 11:14 PM, The Open Journals editorial robot @.***> wrote:
Closed #6844https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6844 as completed.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6844#event-13902766284, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUMZWBW7334PI4CXF6BNBRLZRUKZRAVCNFSM6AAAAABI2KT3T6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJTHEYDENZWGYZDQNA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
[ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6844#event-13902766284", "url": "https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6844#event-13902766284", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Aravind-Sundararajan<!--end-author-handle-- (Aravind Sundararajan) Repository: https://github.com/Aravind-Sundararajan/MocoExtendProblem Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @0todd0000, @aasadi1 Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Aravind-Sundararajan. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Aravind-Sundararajan if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: