search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
696 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: A tool for qualitative data analysis designed to support computational thinking #6853

Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@cproctor<!--end-author-handle-- (Chris Proctor) Repository: https://github.com/cproctor/qualitative-coding Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.3.2 Editor: !--editor-->@ymzayek<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d0c7ed7cbe8f614d986fc699ae42729"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d0c7ed7cbe8f614d986fc699ae42729/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d0c7ed7cbe8f614d986fc699ae42729/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d0c7ed7cbe8f614d986fc699ae42729)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cproctor. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cproctor if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (1529.5 files/s, 121362.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          71            475            378           3786
reStructuredText                 2            208             64            713
XSD                              1              7             32            462
Markdown                         2             18              0            108
TeX                              1              1              0             67
TOML                             1              6              0             30
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
YAML                             1              4              3             10
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            81            731            485           5211
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   193  Chris Proctor
     3  Varun Bhatt
     2  Chris
     1  dependabot[bot]
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 384

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 1 month ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/3287324.3287440 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: NVivo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Plain Person’s Guide to Plain Text Social Scie...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Realizing mixed-methods approaches with MAXQDA
- No DOI given, and none found for title: UNIX Time-Sharing System
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Delphi technique: A credible research methodol...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Qualitative and mixed methods data analysis using ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Qualitative Data Analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Atlas. ti for qualitative data analysis

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

crvernon commented 1 month ago

A note, the authors are using the following OSI approved license: https://opensource.org/license/agpl-v3

crvernon commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot invite @ymzayek as editor

:wave: @ymzayek - can you take this one on as editor?

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

ymzayek commented 1 month ago

Sure @crvernon can do

ymzayek commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Assigned! @ymzayek is now the editor

ymzayek commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ymzayek commented 1 month ago

Hi @cproctor, thank you for submitting to JOSS. I am the handling editor for this submission. Do you have any suggestion for reviewers? You can use the potential reviewers list provided at the top of this issue. I think people interested in data analysis methods, the social sciences and computer science would be a good fit. If you have suggestions, please provide a list of potential reviewers here but do not use the @ character to avoid receiving unwanted notifications. Thank you in advance.

ymzayek commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 1 month ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/3287324.3287440 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: NVivo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Plain Person’s Guide to Plain Text Social Scie...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Realizing mixed-methods approaches with MAXQDA
- No DOI given, and none found for title: UNIX Time-Sharing System
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Delphi technique: A credible research methodol...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Qualitative and mixed methods data analysis using ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Qualitative Data Analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Atlas. ti for qualitative data analysis

INVALID DOIs

- None
cproctor commented 4 weeks ago

Hi @ymzayek, thanks for taking on this paper as editor. I read through the list of reviewers; the following appear to have relevant interests and expertise:

cproctor commented 4 weeks ago

@ymzayek I checked the references noted as missing DOIs; none have DOIs.

ymzayek commented 3 weeks ago

Hello @jhagerer, @hendr1km, and @SamHames,

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

A tool for qualitative data analysis designed to support computational thinking

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6853).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

SamHames commented 3 weeks ago

@ymzayek I'd love to review this, but I already have a lot on, including another JOSS review, and wouldn't be able to look at this until early August. If you haven't found anyone else sooner, feel free to sign me up.

ymzayek commented 3 weeks ago

@SamHames no worries, thanks for the reply!

ymzayek commented 2 weeks ago

Hello @pmyteh and @cmaimone

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

A tool for qualitative data analysis designed to support computational thinking

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6853).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

cmaimone commented 2 weeks ago

Yes, I can review this package

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:06 PM Yasmin @.***> wrote:

Hello @pmyteh https://github.com/pmyteh and @cmaimone https://github.com/cmaimone

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

A tool for qualitative data analysis designed to support computational thinking

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#6853 https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6853).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6853#issuecomment-2192324747, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNECTP3DSBYIEPDVRVIZGTZJL7JHAVCNFSM6AAAAABI47BKJOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOJSGMZDINZUG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

pmyteh commented 2 weeks ago

I'm afraid I have no capacity just now - sorry.

cproctor commented 2 weeks ago

@ymzayek I know two invited reviewers have not yet written back but here are three more potential reviewers with relevant expertise, in case you want to invite others to review:

Thanks, everyone--I know everyone is busy.

ymzayek commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the additional suggestions @cproctor, I will send out another message.

ymzayek commented 2 weeks ago

Hello @deniederhut and @rmhogervorst,

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

A tool for qualitative data analysis designed to support computational thinking

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6853).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

deniederhut commented 1 week ago

I don't have the bandwidth right now but please feel free to reach out in the future

hendr1km commented 1 week ago

I am sorry, I do not have the capacity at the moment - although I will keep this software in mind for qualitative work in the future.