Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.18 s (396.8 files/s, 113983.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 4 0 0 4414
Python 11 853 1322 4023
JavaScript 5 493 71 2611
Markdown 19 912 0 2560
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1833 305
TeX 1 23 0 205
YAML 10 28 10 202
TypeScript 3 20 12 151
Vuejs Component 1 19 1 129
TOML 1 10 2 78
make 1 20 4 43
SVG 9 0 0 28
CSS 1 1 0 12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 71 2379 3255 14761
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
247 Fritz Lekschas
36 dependabot[bot]
12 Trevor Manz
1 Dan RosΓ©n
1 Kurt McKee
1 Sehi L'Yi
1 pablo-gar
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1868
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: Apache License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.05275 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7522322 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03021 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1802.03426 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1312.6114 is OK
- 10.1080/14786440109462720 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/puxnf is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.018 may be a valid DOI for title: Spatial and temporal organization of the genome: C...
- 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 may be a valid DOI for title: HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis...
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04718-w may be a valid DOI for title: Extricating human tumour immune alterations from t...
- 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100372 may be a valid DOI for title: New interpretable machine-learning method for sing...
- 10.1038/s41594-022-00892-7 may be a valid DOI for title: Diverse silent chromatin states modulate genome co...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: News category dataset
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Color universal design (cud)-how to make figures a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Visualizing Data using t-SNE
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmark...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bokeh: Python library for interactive visualizatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Datashader: Accurately Render Even the Largest Dat...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Traitlets: A Lightweight Traits Like Module
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Anywidget: Jupyter Widgets Made Easy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GeoNames
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ipywidgets: Interactive Widgets for the Jupyter No...
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot commands
Hello @flekschas, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.05275 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.018 is OK
- 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04718-w is OK
- 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100372 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7522322 is OK
- 10.1038/s41594-022-00892-7 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03021 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1802.03426 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1312.6114 is OK
- 10.1080/14786440109462720 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/puxnf is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: News category dataset
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Color universal design (cud)-how to make figures a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Visualizing Data using t-SNE
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmark...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bokeh: Python library for interactive visualizatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Datashader: Accurately Render Even the Largest Dat...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Traitlets: A Lightweight Traits Like Module
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Anywidget: Jupyter Widgets Made Easy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GeoNames
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ipywidgets: Interactive Widgets for the Jupyter No...
INVALID DOIs
- None
xiaohk
fil
paulbrodersen
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor
:wave: @faroit - can you take this one on as editor?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor
Just adding another ping.
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor
π @faroit - can you take this one on as editor?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@crvernon i'm not sure if I would be a good fit for editing as I am not up-to-date on the data visualization landscape. Nonetheless, I could take over if no one else is available but not before end of june.
@faroit - thanks for your feedback. At this point, you are the only available editor in this track that has availability (it's been a busy season!). It would be great if you could take this one on and I can provide any help along the way if specific questions come along. Thanks!
Just to resurface. Here my list of reviewer ideas:
The first two are visualization researchers/engineers. The third one also seems proficient in the visualization and Python space.
@editorialbot add @faroit as editor
@faroit - I know you are not going to be active in this one until a week from now but I wanted to get it assigned so we can get it out of queue and ready for you when you become available. Thanks!
Assigned! @faroit is now the editor
π Hi @flekschas, thanks for your submission to JOSS! I will be serving as the editor for this. We'll use this issue to identify reviewers and resolve technical issues.
Regarding this submission, it would be great to have reviewers with domain knowledge who also have experience with visualization software. In addition to your proposals I would like to ask the following potential reviewers
j9ac9k
campagnola
csadorf
ianhi
For this, please check the JOSS COI policy and get back to me if i could invite them.
Thanks @faroit. I don't see any conflict of interest for the reviewers you suggested. However, one small note: I acted as a reviewer for ianhi
's recent JOSS paper mpl-interactions
: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05651. I don't think this counts as a conflict of interest but I want to mention it anyway.
@faroit Any updates? :) I know it's summer time but it's been a minute since we submitted the paper. Happy to look for more reviewer candidates if that'd be helpful.
Thanks @faroit. I don't see any conflict of interest for the reviewers you suggested. However, one small note: I acted as a reviewer for
ianhi
's recent JOSS papermpl-interactions
: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05651. I don't think this counts as a conflict of interest but I want to mention it anyway.
thanks for mentioning that, I would rather tend to treat this as a potential COI, so I would request without that reviewer for now.
π @j9ac9k @campagnola @csadorf @xiaohk @fil @paulbrodersen - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The software under review is https://github.com/flekschas/jupyter-scatter
This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.
I am on holiday until July 29th included, but happy to make some time July 30th - Aug 2nd for the first (and hopefully only) round of revisions - if that is timely enough. Either way, at first glance it looks like a pretty cool and useful tool, congratulations!
π @j9ac9k @campagnola @csadorf @xiaohk @Fil @paulbrodersen - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The software under review is https://github.com/flekschas/jupyter-scatter
This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.
Hi @faroit! Happy to review this submission!
@faroit Back from my holiday and available.
@editorialbot add @xiaohk to reviewers
@xiaohk added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @paulbrodersen to reviewers
@paulbrodersen added to the reviewers list!
@paulbrodersen @xiaohk π hi and thanks a lot for helping out to review!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7059.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@flekschas<!--end-author-handle-- (Fritz Lekschas) Repository: https://github.com/flekschas/jupyter-scatter/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.16.0 Editor: !--editor-->@faroit<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @xiaohk, @paulbrodersen Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @flekschas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@flekschas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: