[PRE REVIEW]: densify: An R package to prune sparse data frames of typological linguistic data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@annagraff<!--end-author-handle-- (Anna Graff) Repository: https://github.com/annagraff/densify Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e896a6a49ef4fd23d6b2c0c835f9954e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e896a6a49ef4fd23d6b2c0c835f9954e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e896a6a49ef4fd23d6b2c0c835f9954e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e896a6a49ef4fd23d6b2c0c835f9954e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @annagraff. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@annagraff if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1491.7 files/s, 192105.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               19            374            444           1104
Rmd                              1            161            540            439
Markdown                         4             54              0            177
CSV                              1              0              0            162
TeX                              2             10              0            119
YAML                             1              0              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            28            599            988           2019
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   121  Anna Graff
    77  Marc Lischka
    21  marclischka
    11  Taras Zakharko
     9  Work
     5  reinhardfurrer
     2  Balthasar Bickel

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1319

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.7385533 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7976754 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7836668 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2677911 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7740140 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10804357 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: admmDensestSubmatrix: Alternating Direction Method...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: FSelector: Selecting Attributes
- No DOI given, and none found for title: varrank: Heuristics Tools Based on Mutual Informat...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@annagraff - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

☝ to generate the most similar paper recommendation list which has been broken for some time.

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

kdensity: An R package for kernel density estimation with parametric starts and asymmetric kernels Submitting author: @JonasMoss Handling editor: @terrytangyuan (Retired) Reviewers: @gvegayon, @TrashBirdEcology Similarity score: 0.8079

enetLTS: Robust and Sparse Methods for High Dimensional Linear, Binary, and Multinomial Regression Submitting author: @fskurnaz Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active) Reviewers: @mcavs, @marastadler Similarity score: 0.8079

quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data Submitting author: @kenbenoit Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @lmullen, @borishejblum, @alexgarciac Similarity score: 0.8046

phylogram: an R package for phylogenetic analysis with nested lists Submitting author: @shaunpwilkinson Handling editor: @karthik (Retired) Reviewers: @arfon Similarity score: 0.8023

text2map: R Tools for Text Matrices Submitting author: @dustinstoltz Handling editor: @chartgerink (Retired) Reviewers: @alexanderfurnas, @cmaimone Similarity score: 0.8017

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @osorensen as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

[osorensen]

👋 @dustinstoltz, @kenbenoit, @elenlefoll, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[elenlefoll]

Hi! I'm available if the review deadline is end of July at the earliest.