[PRE REVIEW]: GeoStats.jl - High-performance geostatistics in Julia

[whedon]

Submitting author: @juliohm (Júlio Hoffimann) Repository: https://github.com/juliohm/GeoStats.jl Version: v0.6.0 Editor: @lheagy Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @juliohm. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@juliohm if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @lheagy it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[arfon]

:wave: @lheagy, the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor.

[juliohm]

Thank you @arfon for the follow up. I noticed that the figure in the compiled PDF is placed differently than in my local version. Is there a template that I can use to reproduce exactly the document compiled by the bot?

[juliohm]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

[juliohm]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[juliohm]

I've fixed the figure placement issue, and other small English issue. Looking forward to start the review.

Best,

[juliohm]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[lheagy]

Thanks @arfon, I am happy to take this. @juliohm: do you have any suggestions for reviewers?

[lheagy]

👋 Hi @nuest, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[juliohm]

Hi @lheagy, thank you for the prompt reply and for pinging @nuest. Is there a list of reviewers from which to select similar to the list of editors on the JOSS website?

[lheagy]

@juliohm, the list is here: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers. Ideally, we find 2 reviewers

[juliohm]

:wave: @dhhagan @ziotom78 @wkearn @rowanc1 would any of you be available to review the submission? I've checked your profiles and websites, and concluded that you all have experience with spatial data, geosciences & statistics. Looking forward to your feedback.

[wkearn]

I'd be happy to review!

[ziotom78]

Ok for me.

[lheagy]

Thanks @wkearn and @ziotom78!

[lheagy]

@whedon assign @wkearn as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @wkearn

[lheagy]

@whedon add @ziotom78 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @ziotom78 is now a reviewer

[lheagy]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[lheagy]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/692. Feel free to close this issue now!