openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Staring down direct infusion metabolomics datasets with MeDUSA #6892

Open editorialbot opened 5 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@laura-hetzel<!--end-author-handle-- (Laura Ann Hetzel) Repository: https://github.com/laura-hetzel/MeDUSA Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@diazrenata<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/95fd8471eaa8ddcb50beadccffcf8167"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/95fd8471eaa8ddcb50beadccffcf8167/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/95fd8471eaa8ddcb50beadccffcf8167/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/95fd8471eaa8ddcb50beadccffcf8167)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @laura-hetzel. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@laura-hetzel if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

No paper file path
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=1.49 s (42.4 files/s, 103731.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              9              1              0         114453
XML                              6              0              0          34900
R                               40            532           1417           2650
Markdown                         1             18              0             48
TeX                              1              6              0             48
Bourne Shell                     4             11             16             37
Dockerfile                       1              7             14             27
Python                           1              4              2             10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            63            579           1449         152173
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   114  Pascal
    72  NotEric
    26  Laura Hetzel
    14  Eman-Mu
    11  David Rasp
    10  klabla
     8  Merys Valdez
     8  Pascal Maas
     4  Ahmed Ali
     2  Alida Kindt-Dunjko
     1  StatisticsValdez
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Paper file info:

⚠️ Failed to find a paper file in https://github.com/laura-hetzel/MeDUSA

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

TheFollyLlama commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 4 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1002/anie.201709719 is OK
- 10.1038/nprot.2016.156 is OK
- 10.1021/ac051437y is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkab382 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-024-55356-3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- 10.3109/03014460.2013.807878. is INVALID
TheFollyLlama commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 4 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3109/03014460.2013.807878 is OK
- 10.1002/anie.201709719 is OK
- 10.1038/nprot.2016.156 is OK
- 10.1021/ac051437y is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkab382 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-024-55356-3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot invite @zhubonan as editor

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@zhubonan this work may be somewhat outside of your usual domain, but I was wondering if you are familiar with the techniques employed and therefore able to handle it regardless. Thanks anyway.

zhubonan commented 4 months ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Sorry, this is a bit far from my domain...

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot invite @diazrenata as editor

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

diazrenata commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Assigned! @diazrenata is now the editor

diazrenata commented 4 months ago

Hi @laura-hetzel! I'll be editing this submission. Have you had a chance to look at the reviewer application and identify any potential reviewers?

TheFollyLlama commented 4 months ago

Hi @diazrenata. Found a few: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/search?language=29&area_id=&keywords=mass+spec

diazrenata commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot check repository

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=1.41 s (44.6 files/s, 107463.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              9              1              0         114453
XML                              5              0              0          32339
R                               40            527           1451           2652
YAML                             2              3             15             50
Markdown                         1             18              0             48
TeX                              1              6              0             48
Bourne Shell                     4             11             16             37
Dockerfile                       1              6             14             28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            63            572           1496         149655
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   114  Pascal
    83  NotEric
    26  Laura Hetzel
    14  Eman-Mu
    11  David Rasp
    10  klabla
     8  Merys Valdez
     8  Pascal Maas
     4  Ahmed Ali
     2  Alida Kindt-Dunjko
     2  Eric Hetzel
     1  StatisticsValdez
editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 958

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

diazrenata commented 4 months ago

@laura-hetzel and @TheFollyLlama - on looking over the repo, my first question is about a general description of the software. Usually this information is in the README - e.g. what the software does, how to install it and use it, any dependencies, and examples. Could you add a page like this? It would make it much easier for reviewers and potential users of the software.

Also - is @laura-hetzel or @TheFollyLlama the author for correspondence?

TheFollyLlama commented 3 months ago

hi @diazrenata. I've updated the README. The R requirements are in the R package directory . Easiest way to install and use is via the dockerhub image

The corresponding author is @ahmed-ali9

laura-hetzel commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @diazrenata can we please get an update on the status of the review? Also, we indicated that @ahmed-ali9 is the corresponding author, but he has not been added to this repository. Thank you!

ahmed-ali9 commented 1 day ago

Dear @diazrenata , we would like an update of the status of the manuscript please? Just incase this does not reach you, i have taken the liberty to also send you an email, i hope thats okay!