Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1109/icra.2011.5980567 may be a valid DOI for title: 3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing
- 10.1109/lra.2022.3152830 may be a valid DOI for title: Faster-LIO: Lightweight Tightly Coupled Lidar-Iner...
- 10.1109/icra48506.2021.9560835 may be a valid DOI for title: Voxelized GICP for Fast and Accurate 3D Point Clou...
- 10.1007/bf01427149 may be a valid DOI for title: Iterative point matching for registration of free-...
- 10.15607/rss.2009.v.021 may be a valid DOI for title: Generalized-icp.
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.05 s (2413.3 files/s, 229951.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 40 798 276 3548
C/C++ Header 45 781 734 2872
Markdown 8 235 0 668
Python 9 248 79 643
YAML 10 64 13 449
CMake 3 46 43 288
Bourne Shell 4 14 0 55
TeX 1 5 0 50
Dockerfile 2 22 0 42
TOML 1 9 0 40
make 1 5 0 23
XML 1 4 3 15
reStructuredText 2 8 12 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 127 2239 1160 8702
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
65 k.koide
46 koide3
4 Martin Valgur
2 Atticus Zhou
2 Daisuke Nishimatsu
2 Nikhil Khedekar
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 663
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
👋 @koide3 - thanks for your submission.
Please
@editorialbot check references
to check them again@editorialbot generate pdf
after making changes (or when the references are right) to make a new PDF@editorialbot
commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
In the meantime, I'll look for an editor for your submission.
👋 @galessiorob - would you be able to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @galessiorob as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
👋 @danielskatz Thank you for handling our submission. I just updated and re-generated the paper accordingly. I look forward to receiving reviews.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980567 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1801.09847 is OK
- 10.1109/LRA.2022.3152830 is OK
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9560835 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01427149 is OK
- 10.15607/rss.2009.v.021 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@koide3 - thanks for the updates. Once there is an editor, they will be in touch with you about next steps
👋 @diehlpk - Do you think you would be able to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor
Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor
@danielskatz Thank you so much for serving as an editor of our submission. As reviewer candidates, I found the following people from the reviewer list: SteveMacenski, abougouffa, versatran01, jingnanshi, CameronDevine, ekorudiawan
@diehlpk is the editor. I am the track editor, and you won't hear from me again until the end of the process or if there are problems along the way
Sorry, I mistyped. Thank you @diehlpk for serving as an editor.
Hi @koide3 could you please recommend some potential reviewers. Please post their GitHub handle without the @ so they are not getting a notification yet.
@diehlpk As reviewer candidates, I found the following people from the reviewer list: SteveMacenski, abougouffa, versatran01, jingnanshi, CameronDevine, ekorudiawan
Hi @SteveMacenski do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @abougouffa do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @versatran01 do you have time to review this paper?
I can do it
Hi @abougouffa do you have time to review this paper?
Hello @diehlpk, yes I can! Thanks for the mention.
@diehlpk Yes I can review this paper.
@editorialbot add @versatran01 as reviewer
@versatran01 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @abougouffa as reviewer
@abougouffa added to the reviewers list!
Hi @versatran01 and @abougouffa thanks for agreeing to review.
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6948.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@koide3<!--end-author-handle-- (Kenji Koide) Repository: https://github.com/koide3/small_gicp Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @versatran01, @abougouffa Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @koide3. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@koide3 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: