Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1244.6 files/s, 178660.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 27 895 1494 2357
Markdown 15 276 0 591
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1862 284
YAML 5 10 0 112
TeX 1 9 0 62
TOML 1 3 0 29
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 56 1205 3364 3470
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
181 Aneesh Naik
40 michael-petersen
6 Michael Petersen
6 aneeshnaik
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.01864 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05582 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04113 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyMC: Bayesian Stochastic Modelling in Python
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 720
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@matt-graham, @vankesteren - This is the review thread. Please first, create your checklist.
In that checklist, there are several tasks to do and they are helpful to draw a road-map in your review.
You can type
@editorialbot generate my checklist
to create your checklist.
Thank you in advance.
I will add relevant issues as I go to this list
Relevant GitHub Gist for the main comment: https://gist.github.com/vankesteren/1854cf92b6ec26a3bb9628048bb2b9b6
@jbytecode I've completed my review. See my comment above for the issues I've opened in the original repository, the main one being #8.
@aneeshnaik - Please review the suggestions and corrections given in the opened issues. Please ping us when you have done with them.
@vankesteren - Thank you!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@aneeshnaik<!--end-author-handle-- (Aneesh Naik) Repository: https://github.com/aneeshnaik/lintsampler Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.3.0 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @matt-graham, @vankesteren Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@matt-graham & @vankesteren, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jbytecode know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @vankesteren
📝 Checklist for @matt-graham