Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.12688/f1000research.23224.2 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK
- 10.15497/RDA00068 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5171937 is OK
- 10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0 is OK
- 10.35097/1979 is OK
- 10.35097/1846 is OK
- 10.35097/1799 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Software publications with rich metadata: state of...
INVALID DOIs
- doi.org/10.14454/3w3z-sa82 is INVALID because of 'doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106223 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with affiliations for Terry Cojean, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting?.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.05 s (1340.2 files/s, 117299.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 29 594 436 1953
Markdown 7 211 0 891
JSON 5 0 0 545
YAML 12 13 21 239
XML 3 0 0 139
TeX 1 10 0 108
TOML 1 8 0 90
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
reStructuredText 1 8 15 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 61 856 480 4003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
99 Marie Houillon
73 Axel Loewe
27 Jochen Klar
7 Tomas Stary
4 Ziad Boutanios
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1183
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: Apache License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@MarieHouillon - thanks for your submission.
Note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. In addition, you could work on the invalid DOIs that editorialbot notes. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references
to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf
after making changes to the .md file or when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.12688/f1000research.23224.2 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK
- 10.15497/RDA00068 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5171937 is OK
- 10.14454/3w3z-sa82 is OK
- 10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2201.09015 is OK
- 10.35097/1979 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106223 is OK
- 10.35097/1846 is OK
- 10.35097/1799 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@MarieHouillon - thanks for your quick fixes. We'll now have a discussion amongst the JOSS editors about if this is research software as defined by JOSS. This could take a week or two.
@editorialbot query scope
Submission flagged for editorial review.
Thank you!
@editorialbot generate pdf
☝ generating the most similar papers list (something that has been broken for a while)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
NOMAD: A distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data
Submitting author: @markus1978
Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active)
Reviewers: @arosen93, @berquist, @sgbaird
Similarity score: 0.7053
CiteLang: Modeling the Research Software Ecosystem
Submitting author: @vsoch
Handling editor: @faroit (Active)
Reviewers: @gflofst, @rmmilewi
Similarity score: 0.6991
cffr: Generate Citation File Format Metadata for R Packages
Submitting author: @dieghernan
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6943
CHAMP is a HPC Access and Metadata Portal
Submitting author: @cc-a
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @thurber, @acrlakshman
Similarity score: 0.6942
PROFFASTpylot: Running PROFFAST with Python
Submitting author: @feldl
Handling editor: @rwegener2 (Active)
Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom
Similarity score: 0.6865
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @MarieHouillon - we'll accept this for review, and get started shortly.
👋 @atrisovic - I know you are currently at your editing limit, but this seems potentially a good fit for you, so I wonder if you might want to take it, particularly if you are close to done with any of the others you are editing. If not, I will handle it, but I thought I would try you first.
@editorialbot invite @atrisovic as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Hi @danielskatz I would love to edit this paper. Thank you for the invite!
@editorialbot add me as editor
Assigned! @atrisovic is now the editor
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@MarieHouillon<!--end-author-handle-- (Marie Houillon) Repository: https://git.opencarp.org/openCARP/FACILE-RS Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v2.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@atrisovic<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MarieHouillon. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@MarieHouillon if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: