openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
694 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Orbital Dynamics in X-ray stellar binary systems #6923

Open editorialbot opened 5 days ago

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@xragua<!--end-author-handle-- (Graciela Sanjurjo Ferrín) Repository: https://github.com/xragua/xraybinaryorbit Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7f4fbc6a63adc4ba5a07bb340a4d7246"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7f4fbc6a63adc4ba5a07bb340a4d7246/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7f4fbc6a63adc4ba5a07bb340a4d7246/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7f4fbc6a63adc4ba5a07bb340a4d7246)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @xragua. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@xragua if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 days ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1162/EVCO_r_00180 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa3953 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2232432 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1086/153315 is OK
- 10.1086/160554 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stac352 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2202.05399 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: PySwarms: A Python-Based Swarm Optimization Librar...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Accretion Power in Astrophysics
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An introduction to modern astrophysics and cosmolo...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Accretion Power in Astrophysics

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (344.0 files/s, 189844.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           2            883            710           1625
Markdown                         3            313              0           1068
TeX                              1             21              0            151
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           2246            135
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            13           1218           2960           2997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   122  LAEX
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1849

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Maelstrom: A Python package for identifying companions to pulsating stars from their light travel time variations Submitting author: @danhey Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @hpparvi, @mbobra Similarity score: 0.7075

pySYD: Automated measurements of global asteroseismic parameters Submitting author: @ashleychontos Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @danhey, @benjaminpope Similarity score: 0.6851

AliasFinder: A Python script to search for the true planetary frequency within radial velocity data Submitting author: @StephanStock Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active) Reviewers: @Juanlu001, @wtgee Similarity score: 0.6833

LEGWORK: A python package for computing the evolution and detectability of stellar-origin gravitational-wave sources with space-based detectors Submitting author: @TomWagg Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @dbkeitel, @cmbiwer Similarity score: 0.6809

stingray: A modern Python library for spectral timing Submitting author: @dhuppenkothen Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Cadair Similarity score: 0.6725

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

dfm commented 5 days ago

@xragua — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!