[REVIEW]: carbonr: An R Package for Estimating Carbon-Equivalent Emissions

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@lilyclements@mengqi-z<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @hvwaldow, @zhenchun Archive: Pending

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac6c3fc531d56a9d6915737fef68ff26"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac6c3fc531d56a9d6915737fef68ff26/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac6c3fc531d56a9d6915737fef68ff26/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac6c3fc531d56a9d6915737fef68ff26)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@hvwaldow & @zhenchun, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @mengqi-z know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

@hvwaldow, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@zhenchun, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (2809.6 files/s, 168239.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               66            230           1129           2205
Markdown                         2             81              0            212
Rmd                              3            122            286            125
YAML                             3             12              4             61
TeX                              1              2              0             22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            75            447           1419           2625
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   293  lilyclements

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2021-0172-549 may be a valid DOI for title: Climate Change and Health
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Green Theatre Index: Measuring the Effectiveness o...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting: Conversion Factors 2023

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 996

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

mengqi-z commented 4 days ago

👋 @lilyclements @hvwaldow @zhenchun, Welcome to the review thread for the paper. All communication regarding this submission will take place here.

Please start by reading the "Reviewer instructions & questions" in the first comment above.

Reviewers, please create your checklists outlining JOSS requirements. As you assess the submission, mark any items you believe have been satisfied. Additionally, refer to the JOSS reviewer guidelines linked at the top of this thread.

Our aim is to collaborate with authors to help them meet our criteria. Reviewers are encouraged to submit issues and pull requests directly on the software repository. When doing so, please tag https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6932 in the issue to create a link to this thread, enabling easy tracking. Please feel free to post comments, questions, and suggestions as they arise, rather than waiting until the entire package is reviewed.

We target completing reviews within 4-6 weeks, but please initiate your review well in advance. JOSS reviews are iterative, and your early feedback will help us stay on schedule.

mengqi-z commented 4 days ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2021-0172-549 may be a valid DOI for title: Climate Change and Health
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Green Theatre Index: Measuring the Effectiveness o...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting: Conversion Factors 2023

INVALID DOIs

- None

@lilyclements Could you please add the missing DOIs in your paper.bib? Thank you.

openjournals / joss-reviews