Open editorialbot opened 6 days ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (1049.2 files/s, 267278.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 24 1054 726 2964
TeX 1 163 0 1699
Jupyter Notebook 6 0 6019 840
Markdown 3 107 0 545
YAML 12 50 66 476
reStructuredText 9 157 143 403
TOML 2 4 0 34
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
JSON 1 1 0 16
make 1 5 7 11
Bourne Shell 1 2 8 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 61 1551 6970 7018
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
39 Timothy Smith
21 timothyas
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 3240
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
@editorialbot invite @jromanowska as editor
:wave: @jromanowska - since we are wrapping up one of your other submissions, do you think you could take this one on?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
:wave: @timothyas -There are a few things that you can take care of until I get a topic editor assigned to your submission:
Thanks!
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
STITCHES: a Python package to amalgamate existing Earth system model output into new scenario realizations
Submitting author: @abigailsnyder
Handling editor: @observingClouds (Active)
Reviewers: @znicholls, @Zeitsperre
Similarity score: 0.7081
xeofs: Comprehensive EOF analysis in Python with xarray
Submitting author: @nicrie
Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active)
Reviewers: @DamienIrving, @malmans2
Similarity score: 0.7024
pyCSEP: A Python Toolkit For Earthquake Forecast Developers
Submitting author: @wsavran
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @nvanderelst, @mbarall
Similarity score: 0.7000
epyc: Computational experiment management in Python
Submitting author: @simoninirelland
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @zbeekman, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @amritagos
Similarity score: 0.6965
brains-py, A framework to support research on energy-efficient unconventional hardware for machine learning
Submitting author: @ualegre
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @wob86, @sisco0
Similarity score: 0.6939
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@crvernon thank you for this!
Hi, @crvernon, thanks for the invitation, but I need to decline - I'm going away for holidays entire July. See you in August! :wave:
No problem, thanks @jromanowska!
@editorialbot invite @sneakers-the-rat as editor
:wave: @sneakers-the-rat - are you available to take this one on?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot generate pdf
@crvernon I was able to reduce the paper length dramatically from what it was, to ~1600 words. Please let me know if this is acceptable for JOSS. Thank you!
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
iharm3D: Vectorized General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics
Submitting author: @bprather
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Active)
Reviewers: @bgiacoma, @cpalenzuela
Similarity score: 0.6248
High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.6144
ACHR.cu: GPU-accelerated sampling of metabolic networks
Submitting author: @marouenbg
Handling editor: @lpantano (Active)
Reviewers: @wmegchel, @prasunanand
Similarity score: 0.6030
RHEA: an open-source Reproducible Hybrid-architecture flow solver Engineered for Academia
Submitting author: @lluisjofre
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @ctdegroot, @thomasgillis
Similarity score: 0.6014
starry_process: Interpretable Gaussian processes for stellar light curves
Submitting author: @rodluger
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @nespinoza, @j-faria
Similarity score: 0.5992
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Thanks @timothyas - we will let the assigned topic editor and reviewers provide feedback before I ask for any further cuts. Thanks for knocking this out quickly!
@editorialbot generate pdf
@crvernon I was able to reduce the paper length dramatically from what it was, to ~1600 words. Please let me know if this is acceptable for JOSS. Thank you!
@editorialbot assign @sneakers-the-rat as editor
yes i would be happy to :)
Assigned! @sneakers-the-rat is now the editor
It looks like climate modeling is one of the major intended applications - maybe we can find one reviewer who is a climate modeler and maybe the other is a more general neural networks person? Are there any people the authors would like to recommend as reviewers?
Otherwise I see that @SarthakJariwala , @trontrytel , and @Zeitsperre might be a good fit here - are any of y'all interested in reviewing this package?
Thank you @sneakers-the-rat! I can recommend Troy Arcomano (GitHub username: Arcomano1234) who has extensive experience with Echo State Networks and ML more broadly, applied to weather forecasting. His work is cited in the "Previously existing software" section of our paper.
That sounds perfect, @Arcomano1234 would you be willing to review this package?
Yes of course!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@timothyas<!--end-author-handle-- (Timothy Smith) Repository: https://github.com/timothyas/xesn Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.4 Editor: !--editor-->@sneakers-the-rat<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @timothyas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@timothyas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: