[PRE REVIEW]: WhaleConnect: A General-Purpose, Cross-Platform Network Communication Application

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AidanSun05<!--end-author-handle-- (Aidan Sun) Repository: https://github.com/WhaleConnect/whaleconnect Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mahfuz05062<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @harshadjs, @wob86 Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b8d7a821d1b047017f3bde87e147f7c8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b8d7a821d1b047017f3bde87e147f7c8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b8d7a821d1b047017f3bde87e147f7c8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b8d7a821d1b047017f3bde87e147f7c8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AidanSun05. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AidanSun05 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3389/friot.2022.1073780 is OK
- 10.1186/s40537-019-0268-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Coroutines (C++20)

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (2744.8 files/s, 208543.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             50           1131            552           3642
C/C++ Header                    49            553            414           1483
Swift                            4            112             36            499
Markdown                        10            249              0            490
YAML                            13             95             10            485
Lua                              6             64             24            287
Python                           3             50             37            157
TeX                              1              2              0             28
XML                              1              0              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           137           2256           1073           7080
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  1092  Aidan Sun
    33  AidanSun05

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 577

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

BoboCEP: a Fault-Tolerant Complex Event Processing Engine for Edge Computing in Internet of Things Submitting author: @r3w0p Handling editor: @vissarion (Active) Reviewers: @abhishektiwari, @mahsan321 Similarity score: 0.6589

Spectral Connectivity: a python package for computing multitaper spectral estimates and frequency-domain brain connectivity measures on the CPU and GPU Submitting author: @edeno Handling editor: @emdupre (Active) Reviewers: @AJQuinn, @sappelhoff, @EtienneCmb Similarity score: 0.6476

OPSDN: an enhanced SDN simulation framework for OPNET Modeler Submitting author: @ZacharyJia Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @Qingfengmufeng, @pradeeban Similarity score: 0.6387

CHAMP is a HPC Access and Metadata Portal Submitting author: @cc-a Handling editor: @crvernon (Active) Reviewers: @thurber, @acrlakshman Similarity score: 0.6330

OpenMSIStream: A Python package for facilitating integration of streaming data in diverse laboratory environments Submitting author: @eminizer Handling editor: @pibion (Retired) Reviewers: @lucask07, @SergeyYakubov Similarity score: 0.6325

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @mahfuz05062 - given that one of your other editing submissions is just about to be accepted, I wonder if you can take this one as your next?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @mahfuz05062 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[mahfuz05062]

👋 @mahfuz05062 - given that one of your other editing submissions is just about to be accepted, I wonder if you can take this one as your next?

Sure, I would be happy to!

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot assign @mahfuz05062 as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mahfuz05062 is now the editor

[mahfuz05062]

Hi, @AidanSun05 do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here (without tagging them with an @). You can search the the list of people who have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[AidanSun05]

Hello @mahfuz05062, thank you for your response. From the list, I think wob86 and harshadjs could be potential reviewers.

[mahfuz05062]

Hi, @harshadjs and @wob86, do any of you interested in reviewing this article? Thanks!

[harshadjs]

Sure, I'd be happy to review the article.

[wob86]

Yep I’d be happy to

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot add @harshadjs as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@harshadjs added to the reviewers list!

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot add @wob86 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wob86 added to the reviewers list!

[mahfuz05062]

Thank you @wob86 and @harshadjs. As two reviewers agreed to perform the peer-review, I will start the review process now!

[mahfuz05062]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6964.