Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980567 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1801.09847 is OK
- 10.1109/LRA.2022.3152830 is OK
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9560835 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01427149 is OK
- 10.15607/rss.2009.v.021 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.05 s (2478.2 files/s, 236252.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 40 798 276 3548
C/C++ Header 45 781 734 2872
Markdown 8 235 0 668
Python 9 248 79 643
YAML 10 64 13 449
CMake 3 46 43 288
TeX 1 5 0 56
Bourne Shell 4 14 0 55
Dockerfile 2 22 0 42
TOML 1 9 0 40
make 1 5 0 23
XML 1 4 3 15
reStructuredText 2 8 12 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 127 2239 1160 8708
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
66 k.koide
46 koide3
4 Martin Valgur
2 Atticus Zhou
2 Daisuke Nishimatsu
2 Nikhil Khedekar
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 663
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@versatran01 @abougouffa Thank you so much for reviewing small_gicp! I'm so glad that my package is going to be reviewed by professionals in the community. I'm looking forward to hearing any feedback from you.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@koide3<!--end-author-handle-- (Kenji Koide) Repository: https://github.com/koide3/small_gicp Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @versatran01, @abougouffa Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@versatran01 & @abougouffa, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @diehlpk know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @versatran01
π Checklist for @abougouffa