openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
694 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: binomial_cis: A Python Package for Optimal Binomial Confidence Intervals #6949

Open editorialbot opened 5 days ago

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Joe-Vincent<!--end-author-handle-- (Joseph Vincent) Repository: https://github.com/TRI-ML/binomial_cis Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.0.11 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8b27413a62fab828e7a36523821a38c3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8b27413a62fab828e7a36523821a38c3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8b27413a62fab828e7a36523821a38c3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8b27413a62fab828e7a36523821a38c3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Joe-Vincent. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Joe-Vincent if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 days ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: \hrefhttps://search.library.berkeley.edu/permalink...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: \hrefhttps://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: \hrefhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2331986The Use o...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: \hrefhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05439How Generaliz...
- 10.1136/gut.30.10.1439-a may be a valid DOI for title: Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals a...
- 10.1071/as10046 may be a valid DOI for title: On the estimation of confidence intervals for bino...

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (861.6 files/s, 327725.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              2              0              0           2002
SVG                              1              0             19           1598
Python                           9            403            755            659
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           7038            349
reStructuredText                 7            154             61            206
YAML                             4             15              1            130
Markdown                         5             67              0            126
TeX                              1             10              0             45
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            36            661           7882           5150
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    32  Joe Vincent
    12  Joe-Vincent
    10  Joe
     4  HarukiNishimura-TRI
editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 477

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Hypothesize: Robust Statistics for Python Submitting author: @Alcampopiano Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @martinagvilas, @arbennett Similarity score: 0.6971

A Python module to combine $p$ values arising from discrete tests. Submitting author: @Wrzlprmft Handling editor: @vissarion (Active) Reviewers: @steppi, @mdhaber Similarity score: 0.6939

Fast Resampling and Monte Carlo Methods in Python Submitting author: @mdhaber Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active) Reviewers: @SaranjeetKaur, @kose-y Similarity score: 0.6938

presize: An R-package for precision-based sample size calculation in clinical research Submitting author: @aghaynes Handling editor: @majensen (Active) Reviewers: @amoeba, @TomKellyGenetics Similarity score: 0.6903

BayesO: A Bayesian optimization framework in Python Submitting author: @jungtaekkim Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active) Reviewers: @salrm8, @thomaspinder Similarity score: 0.6853

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

crvernon commented 5 days ago

@editorialbot query scope

:wave: @Joe-Vincent - thanks for your submission to JOSS! I am going to place this one up for review with our larger editorial board to ensure that it meets our submission requirements for substantial scholarly effort. This process usually takes about 2 weeks so I'll provide feedback here ASAP.

editorialbot commented 5 days ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.