[PRE REVIEW]: Step-mothur: Nextflow-Based Quality Control and Filtering Pipeline for Highly Multiplexed Amplicon Sequencing Data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jinfinance<!--end-author-handle-- (Rong Jin) Repository: https://github.com/ncezid-biome/HMAS-QC-Pipeline2 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.2.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/764112acf1eb1e09b50ed649be9177ce"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/764112acf1eb1e09b50ed649be9177ce/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/764112acf1eb1e09b50ed649be9177ce/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/764112acf1eb1e09b50ed649be9177ce)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jinfinance. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jinfinance if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 is OK
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 is OK
- 10.1101/081257 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj.2584 is OK
- 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: FastQC

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (635.6 files/s, 41688.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          10            184            183            383
Markdown                         2             44              0            128
TeX                              1              9              0             92
YAML                             3              8              6             77
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            17            245            189            681
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    61  Jin
     3  Rong Jin
     2  Andrew Huang

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1049

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ALPPACA - A tooL for Prokaryotic Phylogeny And Clustering Analysis Submitting author: @hkaspersen Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @mberacochea, @hseabolt, @rcannood Similarity score: 0.7394

Acanthophis: a comprehensive plant hologenomics pipeline Submitting author: @kdm9 Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active) Reviewers: @bricoletc, @gbouras13, @abhishektiwari Similarity score: 0.7384

VPsearch: fast exact sequence similarity search for genomic sequences Submitting author: @jvkersch Handling editor: @lpantano (Active) Reviewers: @tamarahadz, @sdhutchins Similarity score: 0.7368

A reproducible Snakemake pipeline to analyse Illumina paired-end data from ChiP-Seq experiments Submitting author: @mgalland Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired) Reviewers: @vladsaveliev Similarity score: 0.7330

alignparse: A Python package for parsing complex features from high-throughput long-read sequencing Submitting author: @jbloom Handling editor: @will-rowe (Retired) Reviewers: @bede, @afrubin Similarity score: 0.7308

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.