openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
703 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: TurboFlow: Meanline Modelling of Turbomachinery #6979

Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@lasseband<!--end-author-handle-- (Lasse Borg Anderson) Repository: https://github.com/turbo-sim/TurboFlow Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.11 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/012c28a652c451c61c7400c3a68787d2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/012c28a652c451c61c7400c3a68787d2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/012c28a652c451c61c7400c3a68787d2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/012c28a652c451c61c7400c3a68787d2)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @lasseband. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@lasseband if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1115/1.4023122 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4037819 is OK
- 10.1115/GT2005-68716 is OK
- 10.3390/ijtpp4030032 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/c2009-0-20205-4 may be a valid DOI for title: Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of turbomachine...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Organic rankine cycle (ORC) power systems : techno...
- 10.2514/6.2016-0119 may be a valid DOI for title: Meanline Analysis of Turbines with Choked Flow in ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Turboflow: Mean-Line Modelling of Axial Turbines
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CFturbo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: AxSTREAM
- No DOI given, and none found for title: TURBOdesign Suite
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Concepts NREC
- No DOI given, and none found for title: turbigen

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.25 s (830.7 files/s, 250573.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              5              2             46          23906
Python                          90           4329           8896          12083
YAML                            40            354             93           5288
TeX                              2            126              0           1260
reStructuredText                59           1490           2902            922
Markdown                         6            117              0            495
TOML                             1              4              0             39
JSON                             1              0              0             29
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
CSS                              1              0              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           207           6434          11945          44061
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   217  laboan
   144  roagr
    86  Lasse borg anderson
     4  Roberto Agromayor
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1006

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

flowTorch - a Python library for analysis and reduced-order modeling of fluid flows Submitting author: @AndreWeiner Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @akaptano, @JaroslavHron, @salrm8, @hkjeldsberg Similarity score: 0.7158

RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems Submitting author: @DCoppitters Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active) Reviewers: @andr1976, @ClaraBuettner Similarity score: 0.6954

ROSS - Rotordynamic Open Source Software Submitting author: @raphaeltimbo Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired) Reviewers: @srmnitc, @nnadeau Similarity score: 0.6953

SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines Submitting author: @fonsocarre Handling editor: @labarba (Retired) Reviewers: @petebachant, @rafmudaf Similarity score: 0.6942

OpenOA: An Open-Source Codebase For Operational Analysis of Wind Farms Submitting author: @jordanperr Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @gschivley, @brynpickering Similarity score: 0.6922

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kyleniemeyer commented 1 month ago

Hi @lasseband, unfortunately we do not have an editor available to handle your submission right now, and I have to put this on the waitlist.

In the meantime, please take a look at those missing DOI warnings for the paper, and any reviewer recommendations you can make would be welcome.

lasseband commented 1 month ago

Hi @kyleniemeyer,

Thank you for the notification. I will check the DOI warnings and look for potential reviewers.

lasseband commented 1 month ago

Hi again @kyleniemeyer

I have reviewed the DOI warnings and corrected several issues. Most references lacking DOIs do not have an associated DOI, but I have added the ones that do.

Additionally, we have discussed potential reviewers and have a few suggestions. Although none of our suggestions are on the list of people who have already agreed to review, we still believe they would be suitable candidates.

Hope this helps in finding suitable reviewers.