Closed editorialbot closed 4 days ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
Failed to parse BibTeX on value "-731" (NAME) [#<BibTeX::Bibliography data=[11]>, "@", #<BibTeX::Entry >, {:author=>["James Ahrens and Berk Geveci and Charles Law"], :booktitle=>["Visualization Handbook"], :editor=>["Charles D. Hansen and Chris R. Johnson"], :publisher=>["Elsevier"], :title=>["{ParaView}: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization"], :year=>["2005"], :pages=>"717"}]
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.89 s (454.1 files/s, 359120.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 53 0 8 169681
YAML 127 459 45 70221
Fortran 90 87 7838 3833 23904
diff 76 553 8711 11980
Python 42 3485 5518 11001
JSON 2 0 0 2054
TeX 1 24 0 260
CMake 6 86 209 248
SVG 2 0 0 212
C 1 26 2 95
Markdown 2 35 0 88
Bourne Shell 1 13 10 62
zsh 1 11 9 55
MATLAB 1 7 2 29
make 1 6 3 18
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 259 17
INI 1 0 0 16
TOML 1 1 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 406 12544 18609 289946
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
6837 Martin Diehl
1327 Martin Diehl
1185 Test User
924 Philip Eisenlohr
782 Philip Eisenlohr
495 Christoph Kords
325 Sharan Roongta
290 Pratheek Shanthraj
263 Franz Roters
139 Vitesh Shah
128 Franz Roters
105 Luc Hantcherli
92 Daniel Otto de Mentock
82 Luv Sharma
69 Haiming Zhang
64 zhangc43
57 chen
56 Tias Maiti
53 f.basile
52 Claudio Zambaldi
52 Su Leen Wong
43 Denny Tjahjanto
31 Chen Zhang
28 Zhuowen Zhao
26 Mahesh Balasubramaniam
20 Chen Zhang
19 Alankar Alankar
18 Abisheik Panneerselvam
18 Jaeyong Jung
17 Fengbo Han
17 Krishna Komerla
17 Sharan
14 Chen
14 Pratheek Shanthraj
14 William Counts
14 Yi-Chin Yang
13 Aritra Chakraborty
13 Aritra Chakraborty
13 Yun Jo Ro
12 Samad Vakili
11 Nan Jia
11 Taymor El Achkar
10 Eureka Pai
10 d.mentock
9 Harsha Phukan
9 Onur Guevenc
8 Nader Zaafarani
7 Yi Hu
6 David Mercier
6 Eralp Demir
6 Nikhil Prabhu
6 Ruxin Zhang
6 Yannick Naunheim
5 Chuanlai Liu
5 Noriki Fujita
5 Tias Maiti
4 Eureka Pai Kulyadi
4 navyanthkusam
3 Arka Lahiri
3 Cathy Bing
3 Ding Wang
3 Duancheng Ma
3 Jennifer Nastola
3 Yang Su
3 brendanvk
2 Brendan Vande Kieft
2 Bret Dunlap
2 David Cereceda Senas
2 Henry Hutasoit
2 Satyapriya Gupta
2 Shah Vitesh
2 Shaokang Zhang
2 Sheng Zhang
2 Yang Su
2 tiasmaiti
1 1a2a34v
1 Amrit Jena
1 Arko Jyoti Bhattacharjee
1 Brendan Robert Vande Kieft
1 ChuanlaiLiu
1 Hongmei Li
1 Javier Velo
1 Kieran David Nehil-Puleo
1 Mingxuan Lin
1 Ricardo Lebensohn
1 Satya Gupta
1 Sehar Abbas
1 Tobias Binder
1 Unknown
1 Vitesh
1 Yannick Naunheim
1 yi_work
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 916
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
scikit-fem: A Python package for finite element assembly
Submitting author: @kinnala
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @thelfer, @AnjaliSandip
Similarity score: 0.7497
h5fortran: object-oriented polymorphic Fortran interface for HDF5 file IO
Submitting author: @scivision
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @milancurcic, @bast
Similarity score: 0.7441
scida: scalable analysis for scientific big data
Submitting author: @cbyrohl
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @egaraldi, @kyleaoman
Similarity score: 0.7362
Simmate: a framework for materials science
Submitting author: @jacksund
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @bocklund, @utf
Similarity score: 0.7355
$hp\mathrm{3D}$: A Scalable MPI/OpenMP $hp$-Adaptive Finite Element Software Library for Complex Multiphysics Applications
Submitting author: @stefanhenneking
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @peterrum, @likask
Similarity score: 0.7294
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
License info:
🟡 License found:
Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
The license is AGPL-3.0-or-later, GitHub does not detect it properly
For the software report: Since this paper is only about the python code, only the python
subfolder should be considered for statistics.
@editorialbot invite @zhubonan as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot check references
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
Failed to parse BibTeX on value "-731" (NAME) [#<BibTeX::Bibliography data=[11]>, "@", #<BibTeX::Entry >, {:author=>["James Ahrens and Berk Geveci and Charles Law"], :booktitle=>["Visualization Handbook"], :editor=>["Charles D. Hansen and Chris R. Johnson"], :publisher=>["Elsevier"], :title=>["{ParaView}: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization"], :year=>["2005"], :pages=>"717"}]
@MarDiehl can you try to resolve this error? :point_up:
If you make any updates to the .bib file, you can call @editorialbot check references
here again, to check the references again. You can also call @editorialbot generate pdf
to update the paper once the check is passing.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.030 is OK
- 10.1186/2193-9772-3-5 is OK
- 10.1107/S1600576720011103 is OK
- 10.1088/0965-0393/23/8/083501 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK
- 10.1145/1966895.1966900 is OK
- 10.1007/s40192-017-0084-5 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01450 is OK
- 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143471 is OK
- 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1107/s1600576716012942 may be a valid DOI for title: Orientations–perfectly colored
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hierarchical Data Format, version 5
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: YAML
- 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002 may be a valid DOI for title: Large-scale 3D random polycrystals for the finite ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pytest x.y
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Python and HDF5
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman happy to take this one!
@editorialbot assign @zhubonan as editor
Assigned! @zhubonan is now the editor
Hello @SunilAnandatheertha @kinnala @alizma Would you be able to review this submission? According to your profiles in the reviewer information system, this work seems to fit your area of expertise.
Thanks in advance.
Hi @MarDiehl, could you please suggest some reviewers? You can comment with their github handles here. But please don't directly '@' them. Thanks in advance.
Hello @sergiolucarini @hakonanes @mkuehbach Would you be able to review this submission? The process of reviewing for JOSS is unique and takes place on GitHub. This involves reviewing the manuscript and installing/testing/reading the underlying code. You can learn more about it here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#reviewing-for-joss
Please let me know if you are able/unable to review. Your response is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
@zhubonan that work is something I can imagine myself reviewing
I'd be happy to review.
@editorialbot add @hakonanes as reviewer
@hakonanes added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @mkuehbach as reviewer
@mkuehbach added to the reviewers list!
@hakonanes and @mkuehbach Thanks for agreeing to review!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7164.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@MarDiehl<!--end-author-handle-- (Martin Diehl) Repository: https://github.com/damask-multiphysics/DAMASK Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS-paper Version: v3.0.0-beta2 Editor: !--editor-->@zhubonan<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @hakonanes, @mkuehbach Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MarDiehl. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@MarDiehl if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: