openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
700 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: AdOpT-NET0: A technology-focused Python package for the optimization of multi-energy systems #6988

Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@JeanWi<!--end-author-handle-- (Jan F. Wiegner) Repository: https://github.com/UU-ER/AdOpT-NET0 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission Version: v0.1.2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/12578885161d419241e50c5e745b7a11)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JeanWi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JeanWi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.142 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00681 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.089 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107816 is OK
- 10.46855/energy-proceedings-5280 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0199-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.10.002 is OK
- 10.1021/ACS.IECR.3C02226 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Energy system integration options for the North Se...

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120738 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.16 s (1320.6 files/s, 192083.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          55           3411           3658          12216
JSON                            90              2              0           4937
SVG                              2             64              0           1642
CSV                             13              0              0           1103
reStructuredText                30            393            310            793
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0            855            245
YAML                             9             38             20            178
Markdown                         2             26              0            139
TeX                              1             10              0            100
TOML                             1              7              0             53
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           208           3963           4851          21441
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   330  6574114
   156  Jean
   141  Tiggeloven
    92  julia1071
    64  Jan Wiegner
    25  Luca
    24  Wiegner
    15  IngeOssentjuk
     7  6145795
     7  lucabert01
     2  Bertoni
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 895

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems Submitting author: @DCoppitters Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active) Reviewers: @andr1976, @ClaraBuettner Similarity score: 0.7623

The Spreadsheet Energy System Model Generator (SESMG): A tool for the optimization of urban energy systems Submitting author: @chrklemm Handling editor: @timtroendle (Retired) Reviewers: @nick-gorman, @willu47 Similarity score: 0.7543

autumn: A Python library for dynamic modelling of captured CO_2 cost potential curves Submitting author: @Eugenio2192 Handling editor: @timtroendle (Retired) Reviewers: @igarizio, @milicag Similarity score: 0.7416

GHEtool: An open-source tool for borefield sizing in Python Submitting author: @wouterpeere Handling editor: @crvernon (Active) Reviewers: @jasondegraw, @nmstreethran Similarity score: 0.7391

Mat-dp: An open-source Python model for analysing material demand projections and their environmental implications, which result from building low-carbon systems. Submitting author: @kcerva Handling editor: @crvernon (Active) Reviewers: @MoLi7, @nick-gorman Similarity score: 0.7327

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kyleniemeyer commented 1 month ago

Hi @JeanWi, thanks for your submission. Unfortunately, we don't have any editors in this area available to handle this at the moment, so I have to put this on our waitlist. In the meantime, any reviewer recommendations would be welcome (though please don't tag/request them directly).

JeanWi commented 1 month ago

Dear Kyle, thanks for taking this up! Potentially suitable reviewers would be: