Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3069636 is OK
- 10.1109/TAES.2017.2649338 is OK
- 10.1109/MAES.2022.3178973 is OK
- 10.1109/IS.2008.4670418 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1109/radar.2015.7131222 may be a valid DOI for title: Multi-static passive receiver location optimizatio...
- 10.3389/frsip.2022.822894 may be a valid DOI for title: Learning Resource Allocation in Active-Passive Rad...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Passive Radar Coverage Optimization
- 10.1109/radarconf2248738.2022.9764225 may be a valid DOI for title: Maximum Information Fusion of Passive and Active R...
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.18 s (987.6 files/s, 272056.7 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 5 4340 1727 13464
JavaScript 22 1224 842 10581
Python 53 1720 1268 8492
HTML 4 283 11 1252
CSS 7 91 39 627
C/C++ Header 4 121 58 614
Markdown 11 195 0 439
JSON 9 45 0 333
SQL 5 34 23 305
Bourne Again Shell 3 52 26 141
reStructuredText 49 82 268 111
TeX 1 8 0 63
TOML 1 3 0 38
YAML 2 8 21 32
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 178 8218 4291 36527
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
48 z-mathews
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 679
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
EMBERS: Experimental Measurement of BEam Responses with Satellites
Submitting author: @amanchokshi
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @teuben, @mbobra
Similarity score: 0.6671
SPICY: a Python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions
Submitting author: @mendezVKI
Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active)
Reviewers: @nolankucd, @MatthewFlamm, @ctdegroot
Similarity score: 0.6577
3D Line Radiative Transfer & Synthetic Observations with Magritte
Submitting author: @FredDeCeuster
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @gonsie, @CFGrote
Similarity score: 0.6556
traffic, a toolbox for processing and analysing air traffic data
Submitting author: @xoolive
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @junzis, @espinielli
Similarity score: 0.6512
Synaptus: A Matlab/Octave toolbox for synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging
Submitting author: @mh-skjelvareid
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @emanuelhuber, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Similarity score: 0.6509
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @Nikoleta-v3 - As you have another submission that's almost done now, would you be able to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@danielskatz 👋🏻 Unfortunately, I can't edit this submission.
👋 @faroit - do you think you could edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@hugoledoux - Would you be able to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@danielskatz Sorry for not replying sooner. I was out for a couple of days. This isn't in my domain so I wouldn't feel comfortable to edit it.
@danielskatz It's not really my area, but I see above that 2 already rejected (because of this I guess) and I don't see whose an expert in this area here...
However, be aware that I am going on holidays next week for 2w, so handling this might be slower than normal.
If you're okay with this, I'm happy to be the editor.
@hugoledoux - thanks for offering. I think I'll go ahead and take this one myself, as I guess I'm as close to the domain as anyone...
@editorialbot add me as editor
Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor
@z-mathews - Please suggest ~5 potential reviewers. You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. Or people who aren't in the JOSS system would also be ok. If you know their GitHub usernames, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @).
Thank you for considering our submission. Five suggestions for potential reviewers from the above list with topic areas "radar" / "sensing" / "simulation" / "GIS": Timothy George Pelham (LyceanEM), Yonatan Tarazona (yotarazona), Steven Pawley (stevenpawley), Janik Muires (janikmu), Rohit Venkat Gandhi Mendadhala (rvg296).
👋 @yotarazona & @stevenpawley - Would one or both of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
👋 @rvg296 - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
👋 @hasantahir & @thippesha-d - Would one or both of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
👋 @IgorBaratta - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
👋 @rvg296 - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
Yes, would be willing to
Thanks @rvg296 - I'll add you in the system now, but we won't actually start the review until we get one or two more reviewers as well.
@editorialbot add @rvg296 as reviewer
@rvg296 added to the reviewers list!
👋 @hasantahir & @thippesha-d - Would one or both of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
I am happy to do so.
Sure I will do it
👋 @IgorBaratta - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
Thank you for the invitation; unfortunately, I don't have the bandwidth to do it at the moment.
👋 @hasantahir & @thippesha-d - thanks for volunteering. I'll add you both, and we'll start the review
@editorialbot add @hasantahir as reviewer
@hasantahir added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @thippesha-d as reviewer
@thippesha-d added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7052.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@z-mathews<!--end-author-handle-- (Zenon Mathews) Repository: https://github.com/swiss-armed-forces/openburst Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @rvg296, @hasantahir, @thippesha-d Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @z-mathews. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@z-mathews if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: