openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
700 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: dlr.esy.grid.match: A Grid Matching & Conversion Tool #6993

Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@OriolRaventosDLR<!--end-author-handle-- (Oriol Raventós) Repository: https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/dlr.esy.grid.match Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c148b1b8280aec04dc4d64fb2c370e4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @OriolRaventosDLR. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@OriolRaventosDLR if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112186 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112163 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112055 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10776749 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3390/en12244728 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111995 is OK
- 10.1016/J.RESS.2013.10.003 is OK
- 10.1038/35019019 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and functio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Comparing clusterings: an overview
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (663.8 files/s, 191743.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              3              0             56           1909
Python                           7            391            756            788
Markdown                         3            112              0            406
TeX                              1             11              0            124
TOML                             1              5              0             39
YAML                             1              1              3             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            16            520            815           3287
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    65  Ontje Lünsdorf
    17  rave_or
     3  Francesco Witte
     3  Theresa Groß
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1415

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GridapDistributed: a massively parallel finite element toolbox in Julia Submitting author: @amartinhuertas Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria, @jedbrown Similarity score: 0.7025

fieldcompare: A Python package for regression testing simulation results Submitting author: @dglaeser Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @idoby, @WilliamJamieson Similarity score: 0.6986

lczexplore: an R package to explore Local Climate Zone classifications Submitting author: @MGousseff Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active) Reviewers: @matthiasdemuzere, @wcjochem Similarity score: 0.6900

GeoClimate: a Geospatial processing toolbox for environmental and climate studies Submitting author: @ebocher Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active) Reviewers: @abhishekvp, @omshinde, @arbennett Similarity score: 0.6847

LinkingLines: Using the Hough Transform to Cluster Line Segments and Mesoscale Feature Extraction Submitting author: @aikubo Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active) Reviewers: @evetion, @nialov Similarity score: 0.6794

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

danielskatz commented 1 month ago

👋 @OriolRaventosDLR - thanks for your submission. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.

danielskatz commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot query scope

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

danielskatz commented 1 month ago

👋 @OriolRaventosDLR - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

danielskatz commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot reject

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper rejected.