Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: learnr: Interactive Tutorials for R
- 10.1201/9780429447273 may be a valid DOI for title: Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Comp...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: shiny: Web Application Framework for R
- No DOI given, and none found for title: WeibullR: Weibull Analysis for Reliability Enginee...
- 10.32614/cran.package.weibullr.learnr may be a valid DOI for title: WeibullR.learnr: An Interactive Introduction to Li...
- 10.32614/cran.package.weibullr.plotly may be a valid DOI for title: WeibullR.plotly: Interactive Weibull Probability P...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: WeibullR.shiny: A ’Shiny’ App for Weibull Analysis...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The new Weibull handbook
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=1.54 s (1562.4 files/s, 372154.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header 1064 68521 29009 215841
HTML 126 3840 231 49031
Sass 423 11874 10180 41652
JavaScript 82 8066 6100 31311
CSS 189 4568 680 25104
R 223 4246 4847 13794
Markdown 43 5039 0 9723
C++ 86 1633 2206 5810
Rmd 74 4301 8663 3534
TeX 9 122 26 1092
SVG 28 3 2 1006
Lua 7 161 251 670
JSON 10 0 0 497
XML 12 0 0 240
LESS 10 13 7 102
C 6 32 15 101
YAML 9 10 7 87
CSV 3 0 0 84
MATLAB 3 7 8 53
Bourne Shell 3 11 9 32
make 2 19 9 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 2412 112466 62250 399795
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
61 Paul Govan
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 468
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: Apache License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Visualizations with statistical details: The ggstatsplot approach
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @njtierney, @kevinrue
Similarity score: 0.6974
FielDHub: A Shiny App for Design of Experiments in Life Sciences
Submitting author: @DidierMurilloF
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @Prof-ThiagoOliveira, @dlebauer
Similarity score: 0.6856
lifelines: survival analysis in Python
Submitting author: @CamDavidsonPilon
Handling editor: @trallard (Retired)
Reviewers: @becarioprecario, @sunhwan
Similarity score: 0.6847
dtrackr: An R package for tracking the provenance of data
Submitting author: @robchallen
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @debruine, @craig-willis
Similarity score: 0.6790
BayesianNetwork: Interactive Bayesian Network Modeling and Analysis
Submitting author: @paulgovan
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @rgiordan
Similarity score: 0.6774
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @paulgovan - how can we understand what the software is specifically in this submission? The code is the repository seems quite large for the functionality described in the paper. Can you explain?
Hi @danielskatz,
This software is intended to serve as an add-on to the WeibullR package, a well-known R package for life data analysis, reliability analysis, and Weibull analysis. It enhances Weibull modeling by enabling interactive, web-based plotting options—a feature commonly found in commercial software but, to the best of my knowledge, not available in open source software.
In addition to the core code, the software package includes documentation, tutorials, unit tests, and other supporting resources, which may contribute to its larger size.
Is there a "diff" that I could use to understand what was written for this package vs what already existed? E.g., are all the 200k lines of C/C++ headers original to this package?
I just reviewed the report above, and something seems off. The software is primarily written in R, and is a few hundred lines of code. It appears that some of the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files might be pulled from the gh-pages branch (website), while the core code is in the main branch.
@editorialbot set main as branch
Done! branch is now main
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (928.4 files/s, 93455.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 1 84 5 457
R 6 64 91 429
Markdown 5 102 0 242
Rmd 2 39 75 73
TeX 1 8 0 65
YAML 3 10 7 61
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 18 307 178 1327
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
62 Paul Govan
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 468
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: Apache License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
👋 @paulgovan - thanks, that was the issue. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.
@editorialbot query scope
Submission flagged for editorial review.
👋 @paulgovan - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@paulgovan<!--end-author-handle-- (Paul Govan) Repository: https://github.com/paulgovan/WeibullR.plotly Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.2.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paulgovan. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@paulgovan if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: