Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1460.6 files/s, 135224.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 22 307 329 1297
Markdown 7 157 0 436
TeX 1 35 0 390
TOML 3 72 1 314
YAML 5 1 8 171
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 38 572 338 2608
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
105 Logan Mondal Bhamidipaty
29 Logan Bhamidipaty
9 CompatHelper Julia
5 dependabot[bot]
1 Dylan Asmar
1 Mykel Kochenderfer
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1165
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1613/jair.1496 is OK
- 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00023-X is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2304.09352 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-019-47148-x is OK
- 10.1177/1729881421999587 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCVE45908.2019.8965237 is OK
- 10.1037/h0069792 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.690370209 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1207.1412 is OK
- 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 is OK
- 10.1145/361002.361007 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1209.5145 is OK
- 10.15607/RSS.2008.IV.009 is OK
- 10.1613/jair.5328 is OK
- 10.1609/icaps.v28i1.13882 is OK
- 10.1007/11871842_29 is OK
- 10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0084 is OK
- 10.1287/moor.12.3.441 is OK
- 10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00378-8 is OK
- 10.1037/e471672008-001 is OK
- 10.1037/h0070888 is OK
- 10.1162/089976698300017467 is OK
- 10.1111/1467-9868.00196 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-1-55860-377-6.50040-2 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00602 is OK
- 10.1016/0022-247X(65)90154-X is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: POMDPs.jl: a framework for sequential decision mak...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Point-based value iteration: an anytime algorithm ...
- 10.1613/jair.1659 may be a valid DOI for title: Perseus: Randomized point-based value iteration fo...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Algorithms for Decision Making
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Monte-Carlo planning in large POMDPs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: AEMS: An anytime online search algorithm for appro...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: E-PCA
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Multidimensional Triangulation and Interpolation f...
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.6590
EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl: Derivative-free ensemble-based model calibration
Submitting author: @odunbar
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @odow, @ziyiyin97
Similarity score: 0.6509
RxInfer: A Julia package for reactive real-time Bayesian inference
Submitting author: @bvdmitri
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @dhvalden, @alstat
Similarity score: 0.6505
A Julia package for bilevel optimization problems
Submitting author: @matbesancon
Handling editor: @poulson (Retired)
Reviewers: @HaoZeke, @vissarion
Similarity score: 0.6467
DynamicOED.jl: A Julia package for solving optimum experimental design problems
Submitting author: @AlCap23
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @KBodolai, @joshuaeh
Similarity score: 0.6406
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Note: This was previously submitted and rejected here: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6673
The authors have made modifications to the codebase that now qualify this submission for consideration.
@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor
:wave: @bmcfee - can you take this one on as editor? Thanks!
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
:wave: Sure, I can take this one. Note that I'm currently at a week-long seminar, but will be back in the office on Monday next week and can get on to the reviewer search.
@editorialbot assign @bmcfee as editor
Thanks @bmcfee! Sounds good!
Assigned! @bmcfee is now the editor
Hi @bmcfee! Thanks for editing this paper. Here's a list of 5 reviewers I think would be well-suited to the paper:
Happy to assist further if you'd like.
Thanks @FlyingWorkshop ! I've already been working on reviewer invitations and have one confirmed so far. I'll keep your suggestions in mind though.
@editorialbot add @alcap23 as reviewer
@alcap23 added to the reviewers list!
Note: reviewer @alcap23 will not be able to start immediately due to holidays
I added a minor patch to update some old dependencies, please refer to v1.1.2 instead of v1.1.1 @AlCap23, @bmcfee.
Thank you @AlCap23 and @bmcfee for agreeing to review our submission. I’m reaching out to PhD programs this coming month, so if there’s anything I can do to help expedite this review please let me know and I’d be happy to address them
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@FlyingWorkshop<!--end-author-handle-- (Logan Bhamidipaty) Repository: https://github.com/JuliaPOMDP/CompressedBeliefMDPs.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1.1 Editor: !--editor-->@bmcfee<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@alcap23<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @FlyingWorkshop. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@FlyingWorkshop if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: