Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10812 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-031-19293-7 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2303.06062 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1155/5708 may be a valid DOI for title: Algebra
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Calculus on manifolds
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An introduction to nonassociative algebras
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Normed division algebras with R: introducing the o...
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (1415.5 files/s, 177428.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 10 173 13 1046
C++ 2 70 20 829
Markdown 5 56 0 256
TeX 3 24 0 201
YAML 3 18 5 81
Rmd 2 95 249 73
C/C++ Header 1 15 1 34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 26 451 288 2520
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
96 robin
46 RobinHankin
1 Robin Hankin
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 659
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
👋 @RobinHankin - I don't understand why you've resubmitted this - given that there's already a submission of this software that JOSS is now reviewing for substantial scholarly effort? Is there something different here?
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Ryacas: A computer algebra system in R
Submitting author: @mikldk
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeLydeamore, @EduPH
Similarity score: 0.6892
OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs
Submitting author: @eendebakpt
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @gsagnol
Similarity score: 0.6834
Economiccomplexity: Computational Methods for Economic Complexity
Submitting author: @pachamaltese
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @JohnCoene, @mpadge
Similarity score: 0.6789
PySymmPol - Symmetric Polynomials
Submitting author: @thraraujo
Handling editor: @phibeck (Active)
Reviewers: @eliotwrobson, @AnnikaStein
Similarity score: 0.6779
TDAstats: R pipeline for computing persistent homology in topological data analysis
Submitting author: @rrrlw
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @corybrunson
Similarity score: 0.6771
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@danielskatz I rewrote paper.md
in accordance with your suggestions yesterday - and this includes substantial reworking. Hence the resubmission, was this incorrect?
yes, this was incorrect. You just need to use the command @editorialbot generate pdf
in the original submission to update the PDF. I'll do that, and then mark this one as withdrawn.
@editorialbot withdraw
Paper withdrawn.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@RobinHankin<!--end-author-handle-- (Robin Hankin) Repository: https://github.com/RobinHankin/evitaicossa Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.0-2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @RobinHankin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@RobinHankin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: