Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.10 s (1387.5 files/s, 260798.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 57 2476 171 11922
SVG 1 0 0 2671
Python 43 1034 1618 1298
JavaScript 12 138 228 911
CSS 4 190 35 779
Markdown 3 95 0 317
Jupyter Notebook 6 0 1566 197
reStructuredText 11 123 227 149
TeX 1 10 0 105
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 140 4078 3853 18384
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
246 vrettasm
25 Michalis Vrettas, PhD
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1541
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
π‘ License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1145/3377929.3398147 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Evolutionary computation: A unified approach.
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyGenAlgo: A simple toolkit for genetic algorithms
- No DOI given, and none found for title: EasyGA - Genetic Algorithms made Easy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DEAP: Evolutionary Algorithms Made Easy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Island Model Genetic Algorithm: On Separabilit...
- 10.1109/access.2020.2990567 may be a valid DOI for title: pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17167-y is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
A parallel global multiobjective framework for optimization: pagmo
Submitting author: @bluescarni
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Retired)
Reviewers: @dgoldri25, @jangmys
Similarity score: 0.7510
Minimalist And Customisable Optimisation Package
Submitting author: @jbuisine
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @stsievert, @torressa
Similarity score: 0.7416
ALNS: a Python implementation of the adaptive large neighbourhood search metaheuristic
Submitting author: @N-Wouda
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @skadio, @kenohori
Similarity score: 0.7245
GAIM: A C++ library for Genetic Algorithms and Island Models
Submitting author: @gdetor
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @sjvrijn, @sarats
Similarity score: 0.7155
Metaheuristics: A Julia Package for Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization
Submitting author: @jmejia8
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @PaulDebus
Similarity score: 0.7142
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
I fixed 3 bib entries correcting some typographical mistakes, including the incorrect DOI as noted above.
@editorialbot query scope
π @vrettasm - Thanks for your submission to JOSS. I am going to pass this one through our larger editorial board for review to see if it meets our substantial scholarly effort requirement. This process should take about 2 weeks and I will let you know when I hear back. Thanks!
Submission flagged for editorial review.
@editorialbot reject
:wave: @vrettasm - Thank you for your submission to JOSS. After further review with our larger editorial board, we have decided that your submission needs a bit of work before it is ready for review in JOSS. The following reasons were identified:
We look forward to the progress of this work in the future and encourage you to continue your work. Thank you.
Paper rejected.
Dear editor,
Thank you very much for taking the time to pre-review my article submission to the JOSS.
Regarding the first reason of the rejection, it is true that I haven't packed the code according to some standards. I thought that is something that can be done later on in the event the paper being accepted.
Regarding the second point, I am not exactly sure what is meant that the provided code can solve only real valued problems, since I have two examples (Traveling Salesman Problem, N-Queens problem) that clearly work with permutation encoded chromosomes.
Finally, regarding the last point there are several umittests (/code/test/) that test the functionality of the genetic operators.
Nevertheless, I fully accept your decision of rejecting my paper.
Your sincerely,
M. Vrettas
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, 14:20 The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:
Paper rejected.
β Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7051#issuecomment-2288595315, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDDWAUDSU4MOIXVXTG6D6TZRNDSLAVCNFSM6AAAAABLUMYTOCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOBYGU4TKMZRGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@vrettasm<!--end-author-handle-- (Michail D. Vrettas) Repository: https://github.com/vrettasm/PyGeneticAlgorithms Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vrettasm. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@vrettasm if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: