Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568429 is OK
- 10.1002/qj.2378 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.5910888 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3737927 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03049 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2312.07852 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: FAIR Principles
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.08 s (1880.9 files/s, 181076.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML 70 629 959 3767
Python 31 689 1214 3645
Bourne Shell 37 414 650 1407
Markdown 2 47 0 188
diff 4 29 131 115
TeX 1 7 0 68
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 145 1815 2954 9190
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
262 Oriol Tintó
234 Andreas Baer
73 Oriol Tintó Prims
66 Fabian.Jakub
4 Oriol.Tinto
1 Michael Krayer
1 Takumi.Matsunobu
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1143
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PyExperimenter: Easily distribute experiments and track results
Submitting author: @tornede
Handling editor: @timtroendle (Retired)
Reviewers: @ArsamAryandoust, @schnorr
Similarity score: 0.6816
MetObs - a Python toolkit for using non-traditional meteorological observations
Submitting author: @vergauwenthomas
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @ashwinvis, @Zeitsperre
Similarity score: 0.6787
Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures
Submitting author: @rico-berner
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @zhaozhang, @gflofst
Similarity score: 0.6761
omni-fig: Unleashing Project Configuration and Organization in Python
Submitting author: @felixludos
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @julianpistorius, @jarrah42
Similarity score: 0.6735
Autosubmit GUI: A Javascript-based Graphical User Interface to Monitor Experiments Workflow Execution
Submitting author: @wuruchi
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @djmitche, @ikayz
Similarity score: 0.6729
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Reviewer suggestions:
Hi @abaer-kit and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.
@jedbrown Can you edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @jedbrown as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@jedbrown Could you take this submission on?
@diehlpk Would this fit in your area of expertise?
@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@kthyng that is too far away from my research. I could take it if we do not find anyone. However, I could judge the code quality only.
ok thanks @diehlpk. Sounds like @jedbrown can do it after all!
@editorialbot assign @jedbrown as editor
Assigned! @jedbrown is now the editor
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@abaer-kit<!--end-author-handle-- (Andreas Baer) Repository: https://gitlab.com/auto-icon/auto-icon Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@jedbrown<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @abaer-kit. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@abaer-kit if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: