Closed editorialbot closed 2 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.11 s (933.2 files/s, 325065.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header 8 3248 4216 17733
Python 14 421 163 2512
JSON 8 1 0 2086
C++ 15 266 109 1608
XML 28 157 36 1583
Markdown 4 122 0 359
YAML 8 6 13 324
CMake 2 40 64 150
TeX 1 12 0 121
Bourne Shell 13 41 30 100
make 1 3 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 102 4317 4631 26582
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
125 David Schneider
117 Frédéric Simonis
109 Florian Lindner
67 Kursat Yurt
56 Kürşat Yurt
18 --global
18 Frederic Simonis
8 David Sommer
7 Gerasimos Chourdakis
6 Kursat_Yurt
6 S0mmerD
5 Kyle Davis
4 Benjamin Uekermann
4 Kursat
4 dependabot[bot]
3 Boris Martin
1 Guillaume De Nayer
1 Klaudius Scheufele
1 timo-schrader
1 uekerman
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.12688/openreseurope.14445.2 is OK
- 10.3390/a14060166 is OK
- 10.18419/darus-4167 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-10581 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.23967/c.coupled.2023.016 may be a valid DOI for title: Data-parallel radial-basis-function interpolation ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Robust and Efficient Barycentric Cell-Interpolatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Second-order projection-based mapping methods for ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)
- 10.1007/978-3-030-47956-5_10 may be a valid DOI for title: ExaFSA: Parallel Fluid-Structure-Acoustic Simulati...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MeTis: Unstructured Graph Partitioning and Sparse ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JSON for Modern C++
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1133
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Micro Manager: a Python package for adaptive and flexible two-scale coupling
Submitting author: @IshaanDesai
Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @mrogowski, @mbkumar
Similarity score: 0.7310
Akantu: an HPC finite-element library for contact and dynamic fracture simulations
Submitting author: @nrichart
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.7185
DMStag: Staggered, Structured Grids for PETSc
Submitting author: @psanan
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @elauksap, @mbarzegary
Similarity score: 0.7119
ogs6py and VTUinterface: streamlining OpenGeoSys workflows in Python
Submitting author: @joergbuchwald
Handling editor: @leouieda (Retired)
Reviewers: @cpgr, @TobbeTripitaka, @akaszynski
Similarity score: 0.7108
AMReX: a framework for block-structured adaptive mesh refinement
Submitting author: @asalmgren
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @MatthewTurk, @RemiLehe, @cmsquared
Similarity score: 0.7070
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@davidscn - thanks for your submission. While I look for an editor, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references
to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf
when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
👋 @diehlpk - would you be willing to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@danielskatz yes, I can do it but only can start in the second week of August.
@editorialbot add @diehlpk as reviewer
Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet
@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor
Thanks!
Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.12688/openreseurope.14445.2 is OK
- 10.3390/a14060166 is OK
- 10.18419/darus-4167 is OK
- 10.23967/c.coupled.2023.016 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-12128 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-10581 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-47956-5_10 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Robust and Efficient Barycentric Cell-Interpolatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MeTis: Unstructured Graph Partitioning and Sparse ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JSON for Modern C++
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
I added now missing DOIs where possible. For the remaining entries, there are at most URLs given and no DOIs available. If that's a problem, I would consider to embed the mentioned URL into the plain text rather than making it a full citation.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @psanan do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @asalmgren do you have time to review this paper?
@diehlpk I work in the same research group as the authors of this paper. If this is a conflict of interest, then I am not a good fit here. If this is not an issue, I am happy to be a reviewer.
@IshaanDesai that would be COI. Would you mind suggestion other reviewers?
@davidscn could you please recommend some potential reviewers?
Realistically I couldn't get to it until October.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 9:12 AM Patrick Diehl @.***> wrote:
Hi @asalmgren https://github.com/asalmgren do you have time to review this paper?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7064#issuecomment-2278292858, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRE6YVU2MP7MBII5YSX6H3ZQTS5PAVCNFSM6AAAAABL22Y3HOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENZYGI4TEOBVHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
-- Ann Almgren Senior Scientist; Dept. Head, Applied Mathematics Pronouns: she/her/hers
@asalmgren That would not be any problem.
@editorialbot add @asalmgren as reviewer
@asalmgren added to the reviewers list!
@davidscn could you please recommend some potential reviewers?
Not entirely sure about the prerequisites to be a reviewer. Of course, we could suggest again the reviewers from https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5842, as they are somewhat familiar with the preCICE-verse and JOSS. Other than that I could maybe suggest @hverhelst
or @antRthorn
. Would that comply with the JOSS formalities?
HI @hverhelst do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @antRthorn do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @diehlpk, thanks for the invite! I have time from the first week of September onwards, is that OK?
Hi @IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?
Due to the clear conflict of interest that we previously discussed, I have to decline here.
@editorialbot add @hverhelst as reviewer
@hverhelst added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7127.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@davidscn<!--end-author-handle-- (David Schneider) Repository: https://github.com/precice/aste Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v3.2.0 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @asalmgren, @hverhelst Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @davidscn. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@davidscn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: