Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1318.0 files/s, 142463.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 28 716 616 2692
Markdown 16 397 0 992
YAML 6 17 8 162
TeX 1 16 0 158
SVG 2 0 0 130
TOML 2 5 0 36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 55 1151 624 4170
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
130 Rico Schrage
56 Jens Sager
8 Jan-Hoerding
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1007/s41109-023-00553-8 is OK
- 10.1186/s42162-022-00209-4 is OK
- 10.1145/3447555.3465415 is OK
- 10.15439/2021F60 is OK
- 10.1177/00375497211068820 is OK
- 10.1145/375735.376120 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101791 may be a valid DOI for title: mango: A modular python-based agent simulation fra...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Artificial intelligence a modern approach
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A survey of distributed optimization
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
- 10.1561/9781680835830 may be a valid DOI for title: On the control of multi-agent systems: A survey
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complex...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Utilizing Python for Agent-Based Modeling: The Mes...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JIAC V: A MAS framework for industrial application...
- 10.1007/0-387-26350-0_7 may be a valid DOI for title: JACKβ’ intelligent agents: an industrial strength p...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: agentframework (2.0.1) [last access 13-11-2023]
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1080
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
FAME-Core: An open Framework for distributed Agent-based Modelling of Energy systems
Submitting author: @KriNiTi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @xtruan, @pgranato
Similarity score: 0.7179
AgentPy: A package for agent-based modeling in Python
Submitting author: @JoelForamitti
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesdamillington, @martibosch
Similarity score: 0.7150
Abmarl: Connecting Agent-Based Simulations with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Submitting author: @rusu24edward
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @seba-1511, @abhiramm7
Similarity score: 0.6885
AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
Submitting author: @KriNiTi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @sebastianboblest, @imcatta
Similarity score: 0.6620
EvoDynamics.jl: a framework for modeling eco-evolutionary dynamics
Submitting author: @kavir1698
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @slwu89, @tijeco
Similarity score: 0.6612
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
π @jsagerOffis - Thanks for your submission. While I look for an editor, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references
to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf
when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
π @fraukewiese & @jbytecode - I know both of you are currently at your editing limits, but I wanted to see if this might be of interest to either of you to edit (based on the energy/Julia aspects respectively); perhaps you are almost done with a current assignment... If neither of you are able to handle it, which is perfectly fine, I will take it.
I am always happy with Julia submissions, count me in
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101791 is OK
- 10.1007/s41109-023-00553-8 is OK
- 10.1186/s42162-022-00209-4 is OK
- 10.1145/3447555.3465415 is OK
- 10.15439/2021F60 is OK
- 10.1561/2600000019 is OK
- 10.1177/00375497211068820 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-61255-9_30 is OK
- 10.1145/375735.376120 is OK
- 10.1007/0-387-26350-0_7 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Artificial intelligence a modern approach
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complex...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JIAC V: A MAS framework for industrial application...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: agentframework (2.0.1) [last access 07-08-2024]
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
@editorialbot assign @jbytecode as editor
I am always happy with Julia submissions, count me in
Thanks!!
Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor
Hi, I just realize it would have been smarter to assign the joss_paper
branch to the submission to make these edits easier.
Is there a way to set this branch at this point?
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101791 is OK
- 10.1007/s41109-023-00553-8 is OK
- 10.1186/s42162-022-00209-4 is OK
- 10.1145/3447555.3465415 is OK
- 10.15439/2021F60 is OK
- 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 is OK
- 10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w is OK
- 10.1561/2600000019 is OK
- 10.1177/00375497211068820 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-61255-9_30 is OK
- 10.1145/375735.376120 is OK
- 10.1007/0-387-26350-0_7 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Artificial intelligence a modern approach
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complex...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JIAC V: A MAS framework for industrial application...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: agentframework (2.0.1) [last access 07-08-2024]
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
FAME-Core: An open Framework for distributed Agent-based Modelling of Energy systems
Submitting author: @KriNiTi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @xtruan, @pgranato
Similarity score: 0.7196
AgentPy: A package for agent-based modeling in Python
Submitting author: @JoelForamitti
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesdamillington, @martibosch
Similarity score: 0.7167
Abmarl: Connecting Agent-Based Simulations with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Submitting author: @rusu24edward
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @seba-1511, @abhiramm7
Similarity score: 0.6892
AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
Submitting author: @KriNiTi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @sebastianboblest, @imcatta
Similarity score: 0.6659
EvoDynamics.jl: a framework for modeling eco-evolutionary dynamics
Submitting author: @kavir1698
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @slwu89, @tijeco
Similarity score: 0.6630
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@jsagerOffis - Hi, I am the handling editor.
Yes, you can change the branch of the paper. Please create the new branch and carry the manuscript and supplementary files into the new branch. Please ping me when you've done with it.
@jsagerOffis - Would you consider citing Julia in its first use?
Here is the bibtex entry:
@article{julia,
doi = {10.1137/141000671},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1137%2F141000671},
year = 2017,
month = {jan},
publisher = {Society for Industrial {\&} Applied Mathematics ({SIAM})},
volume = {59},
number = {1},
pages = {65--98},
author = {Jeff Bezanson and Alan Edelman and Stefan Karpinski and Viral B. Shah},
title = {Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing},
journal = {{SIAM} Review}
}
@jbytecode The paper is on the joss_paper
branch and the correct 0.3.0
state of the software is now also merged to that branch.
I have also added the julia reference to the manuscript.
@editorialbot set joss_paper as branch
Done! branch is now joss_paper
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101791 is OK
- 10.1007/s41109-023-00553-8 is OK
- 10.1186/s42162-022-00209-4 is OK
- 10.1145/3447555.3465415 is OK
- 10.15439/2021F60 is OK
- 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 is OK
- 10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w is OK
- 10.1561/2600000019 is OK
- 10.1177/00375497211068820 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-61255-9_30 is OK
- 10.1145/375735.376120 is OK
- 10.1007/0-387-26350-0_7 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Artificial intelligence a modern approach
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complex...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JIAC V: A MAS framework for industrial application...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: agentframework (2.0.1) [last access 07-08-2024]
INVALID DOIs
- None
@jsagerOffis - Have you performed a CrossRef search for the citations with missing DOIs?
@editorialbot generate pdf
@jsagerOffis - Have you performed a CrossRef search for the citations with missing DOIs?
Yes, I have added DOIs to all references where I could find one.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
FAME-Core: An open Framework for distributed Agent-based Modelling of Energy systems
Submitting author: @KriNiTi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @xtruan, @pgranato
Similarity score: 0.7200
AgentPy: A package for agent-based modeling in Python
Submitting author: @JoelForamitti
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesdamillington, @martibosch
Similarity score: 0.7146
Abmarl: Connecting Agent-Based Simulations with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Submitting author: @rusu24edward
Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active)
Reviewers: @seba-1511, @abhiramm7
Similarity score: 0.6891
WorldDynamics.jl: A Julia Package for Developing and Simulating Integrated Assessment Models
Submitting author: @aurorarossi
Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active)
Reviewers: @ranocha, @StanczakDominik, @miguelraz
Similarity score: 0.6665
EvoDynamics.jl: a framework for modeling eco-evolutionary dynamics
Submitting author: @kavir1698
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @slwu89, @tijeco
Similarity score: 0.6614
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@jsagerOffis - I tested the package, works well. Package is also registered in JuliaHub. However, I failed to see an instruction in README.md on how to install and get the whole stuff ready. Could you please add? Thank you in advance.
Now, our system suggests us some suitable and potential reviewers. I will investigate their submissions and pick them to invite.
Before sending invitations, I want to ask you if you have suggestions for potential reviewers.
@jbytecode I have no suggestions for reviewers and have just added installation instructions to the README.md
πππ Dear @KriNiTi, @rusu24edward, @aurorarossi πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Mango.jl: A Julia-Based Multi-Agent Simulation Framework
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (LINK).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 20 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
Dear @jbytecode, Thank you very much for the invitation to review this very interesting project! Unfortunately, me and my team do not have any experience with Julia at all. Thus, I have to politely decline. Kind regards, Kristina
@KriNiTi - Thank you for the quick response!
@jbytecode Yes, I am available to review this work.
@editorialbot add @aurorarossi as reviewer
@aurorarossi - thank you for accepting our invitation. Whenever we set at least two reviewers, the review will start in a saparate thread. I will provide the instructions there.
@aurorarossi added to the reviewers list!
πππ Dear @kavir1698 πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Mango.jl: A Julia-Based Multi-Agent Simulation Framework
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (LINK).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 20 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
Sorry, I am not able to do this review, I don't know anything about Julia :/
πππ Dear @Datseris πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Mango.jl: A Julia-Based Multi-Agent Simulation Framework
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (LINK).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 20 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
Thank you for inviting me. I am sorry, in a different time I would be happy to review, but I don't have any spare time in the near future.
Thank you for the invitation. Unfortunately, I will not be able to start the review until a few weeks later.
@Datseris, @kavir1698 - Thank you for the quick response.
πππ Dear @Libbum πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Mango.jl: A Julia-Based Multi-Agent Simulation Framework
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (LINK).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 20 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
Hi @jbytecode. Bad timing I'm afraid. Just had a baby.
@Libbum - No, it's a good timing, congratulations!
πππ Dear @Tortar πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Mango.jl: A Julia-Based Multi-Agent Simulation Framework
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (LINK).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 20 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jsagerOffis<!--end-author-handle-- (Jens Sager) Repository: https://github.com/OFFIS-DAI/Mango.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper Version: v0.3.0 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @aurorarossi, @Tortar Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jsagerOffis. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jsagerOffis if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: