[PRE REVIEW]: bursty_dynamics: A Python package for exploring the temporal properties of longitudinal data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AlishaAng<!--end-author-handle-- (Alisha Angdembe) Repository: https://github.com/ai-multiply/bursty_dynamics.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: 0.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7e386a4f0a1aace24e1f8644159cbf11"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7e386a4f0a1aace24e1f8644159cbf11/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7e386a4f0a1aace24e1f8644159cbf11/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7e386a4f0a1aace24e1f8644159cbf11)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AlishaAng. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AlishaAng if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00062-8 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/81/48002 is OK
- 10.1103/physreve.94.032311 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (1290.4 files/s, 216114.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            24            537             72           3854
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
JavaScript                      13            150            261            967
CSS                              6            192             45            788
Python                           7            202            370            395
reStructuredText                23            329            514            177
Markdown                         2             58              0            124
YAML                             2             19              6             96
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1751             59
TeX                              1              5              0             36
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            82           1504           3027           9202
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    61  Alisha Angdembe
     1  AlishaAng

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1659

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

timeseriesflattener: A Python package for summarizing features from (medical) time series Submitting author: @MartinBernstorff Handling editor: @mstimberg (Active) Reviewers: @yarikoptic, @Ebedthan Similarity score: 0.6826

interflow: A Python package to organize, calculate, and visualize sectoral interdependency flow data Submitting author: @kmongird Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active) Reviewers: @wiljnich, @j3r3m1 Similarity score: 0.6716

plotastic: Bridging Plotting and Statistics in Python Submitting author: @markur4 Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active) Reviewers: @gmrandazzo, @SunnyXu Similarity score: 0.6716

ewstools: A Python package for early warning signals of bifurcations in time series data Submitting author: @ThomasMBury Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @mhu48, @mikesha2, @ranzhengcode Similarity score: 0.6688

dtrackr: An R package for tracking the provenance of data Submitting author: @robchallen Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active) Reviewers: @debruine, @craig-willis Similarity score: 0.6665

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

:wave: @AlishaAng - Thank you for your submission to JOSS. At this time we have to reject this submission due to not meeting the substantial scholarly effort requirements due to:

• Lines of code count
• Short commit history

We wish you the best in continuing your work and look forward to seeing more from you in the future.

Thank you.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.

[AlishaAng]

Hello @crvernon,

Thank you for the feedback. I have some questions regarding the requirements that I did not meet according to the report. The software report indicates that my Python code exceeds 300 lines, and my commit history goes back 4 months. I thought this was acceptable, but it seems I may have misunderstood the requirements.

Could you please clarify this for me?

Thank you, Alisha

[crvernon]

:wave: @AlishaAng - the statement in our documentation for substantial scholarly effort is:

Total lines of code (LOC). Submissions under 1000 LOC will usually be flagged, those under 300 LOC will be desk rejected.

In almost all cases, we require a codebase of at least 1000 lines of code and often those around 1000 will get reviewed for scope as well. Sorry for the confusion with this and thank you for the follow-up question.