Closed editorialbot closed 2 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108341 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.21105/JOSS.02520 is OK
- 10.1137/20M1328786 is OK
- 10.1137/100791634 is OK
- 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009 is OK
- 10.1515/jnum-2012-0013 is OK
- 10.1007/s00366-006-0049-3 is OK
- 10.1515/jnma-2021-0081 is OK
- 10.1145/1163641.1163644 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678792.001.0001 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9780898719505 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-09766-4_90 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04157 is OK
- 10.1145/3445791 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PETSc/TAO Users Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard Version ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GridapPETSc
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GridapP4est
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PartitionedArrays
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Trilinos Project Website
- No DOI given, and none found for title: \sl hypre: High Performance Preconditioners
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Preconditing in H(div) and applications
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An implementation of tensor product patch smoother...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1137/s0895479899358194 may be a valid DOI for title: A Fully Asynchronous Multifrontal Solver Using Dis...
- 10.1145/3242094 may be a valid DOI for title: Performance and Scalability of the Block Low-Rank ...
- 10.1007/pl00005386 may be a valid DOI for title: Multigrid in H (div) and H (curl)
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.12 s (1367.5 files/s, 142935.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 140 2383 1444 10603
TOML 5 349 2 1496
Markdown 10 128 0 388
TeX 1 25 0 308
YAML 4 1 8 177
Bourne Shell 6 16 32 76
XML 1 0 0 20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 167 2902 1486 13068
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
378 JordiManyer
10 Alberto F. Martin
2 CompatHelper Julia
2 amartin
1 Santiago Badia
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1728
🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Gridap: An extensible Finite Element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @fverdugo
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @TeroFrondelius, @KristofferC
Similarity score: 0.7520
PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python
Submitting author: @lukeolson
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @mattmartineau
Similarity score: 0.7389
Krylov.jl: A Julia basket of hand-picked Krylov methods
Submitting author: @amontoison
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @prj-, @LeilaGhaffari
Similarity score: 0.7265
BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox
Submitting author: @fbordeu
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @hvonwah, @sthavishtha
Similarity score: 0.7248
PDENLPModels.jl: An NLPModel API for Optimization Problems with PDE-Constraints
Submitting author: @tmigot
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @jmejia8, @HaoZeke
Similarity score: 0.7231
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @JordiManyer - thanks for your submission. As the track editor, I'll work on finding an editor. On your side:
@editorialbot check references
to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf
when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.Julia
should be {J}ulia
in one place I see.@editorialbot check repository
to see how many words are in the paper.👋 @diehlpk - would you be willing to edit this submission?
@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Hi @danielskatz, thank you for your time. I will look into your comments and let you know if I have any doubts.
@danielskatz A first comment: I believe a lot of words are tied to the example. I believe the actual paper is around 1000/1200 words (which is what I thought you guys would be counting). Could I remove the embedded script and point to a file in the repo? I also think it would help readability, but was under the impression that a demo code within the paper was compulsory.
The review criteria (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) do not require or suggest an example in the paper, so moving the example to the repo/docs would be fine.
@editorialbot add @diehlpk as reviewer
Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108341 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.21105/JOSS.02520 is OK
- 10.1137/20M1328786 is OK
- 10.1137/100791634 is OK
- 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009 is OK
- 10.1515/jnum-2012-0013 is OK
- 10.1007/s00366-006-0049-3 is OK
- 10.1515/jnma-2021-0081 is OK
- 10.1145/1163641.1163644 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678792.001.0001 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9780898719505 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-09766-4_90 is OK
- 10.1137/s0895479899358194 is OK
- 10.1145/3242094 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04157 is OK
- 10.1090/S0025-5718-97-00826-0 is OK
- 10.1007/PL00005386 is OK
- 10.1145/3445791 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19004 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PETSc/TAO Users Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard Version ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GridapPETSc
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GridapP4est
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PartitionedArrays
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Trilinos Project Website
- No DOI given, and none found for title: \sl hypre: High Performance Preconditioners
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
I think the DOIs missing at this point are just websites and misc references.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Gridap: An extensible Finite Element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @fverdugo
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @TeroFrondelius, @KristofferC
Similarity score: 0.7440
PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python
Submitting author: @lukeolson
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @mattmartineau
Similarity score: 0.7357
Krylov.jl: A Julia basket of hand-picked Krylov methods
Submitting author: @amontoison
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @prj-, @LeilaGhaffari
Similarity score: 0.7331
PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python
Submitting author: @lukeolson
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @Jeff-Hadley, @victorapm
Similarity score: 0.7236
BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox
Submitting author: @fbordeu
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @hvonwah, @sthavishtha
Similarity score: 0.7197
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.12 s (1377.4 files/s, 143900.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 140 2383 1444 10603
TOML 5 349 2 1496
TeX 1 25 0 313
Markdown 10 111 0 306
YAML 4 1 8 177
Bourne Shell 6 16 32 76
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 166 2885 1486 12971
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
379 JordiManyer
10 Alberto F. Martin
2 CompatHelper Julia
2 amartin
1 Santiago Badia
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1487
🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Gridap: An extensible Finite Element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @fverdugo
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @TeroFrondelius, @KristofferC
Similarity score: 0.7486
PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python
Submitting author: @lukeolson
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @mattmartineau
Similarity score: 0.7398
Krylov.jl: A Julia basket of hand-picked Krylov methods
Submitting author: @amontoison
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @prj-, @LeilaGhaffari
Similarity score: 0.7289
PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python
Submitting author: @lukeolson
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @Jeff-Hadley, @victorapm
Similarity score: 0.7243
BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox
Submitting author: @fbordeu
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @hvonwah, @sthavishtha
Similarity score: 0.7221
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@danielskatz I've applied a first round of edits. Fixed all the doi-related stuff. We are down to 1500 words, and I don't think there is anything superfluous to remove. I'll be happy to shorten it if the reviewers deem it necessary.
@diehlpk On the topic of reviewers : Since this paper is a natural extension of GridapDistributed.jl, we could probably consider the same list that was considered back then. Namely,
but we would be happy with any other reviewer you consider relevant.
@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor
Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor
Hi @PetrKryslUCSD do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @likask do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @Leticia-maria do you have time to review this paper?
Hi @Leticia-maria do you have time to review this paper?
Yes! I can review it by the end of next week.
Hi @PetrKryslUCSD do you have time to review this paper?
Yes.
@editorialbot add @PetrKryslUCSD as reviewer
@PetrKryslUCSD added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @Leticia-maria as reviewer
@Leticia-maria added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7162.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@JordiManyer<!--end-author-handle-- (Jordi Manyer) Repository: https://github.com/gridap/GridapSolvers.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v0.4.0 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JordiManyer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@JordiManyer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: