Open editorialbot opened 3 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.03485 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105210 is OK
- 10.5066/P9X4L3GE is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0239691 is OK
- 10.5066/P94I5TX3 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5573592 is OK
- 10.1002/eap.2130 is OK
- 10.1029/2019WR024883 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.est.9b06406 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-020-0478-7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.024 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Pint: Operate and manipulate physical quantities i...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Tidy data
- No DOI given, and none found for title: WQX Web Application Programming Interface (API)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: WQX Web User Guide
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- 10.1111/j.17521688.2011.00573.x is INVALID
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.13 s (339.6 files/s, 355960.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 12 998 3491 2592
Jupyter Notebook 7 0 37867 685
YAML 8 51 55 302
TeX 1 15 0 160
reStructuredText 9 115 124 152
Markdown 2 47 0 131
Rmd 1 63 164 48
TOML 1 7 0 39
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
JSON 2 0 0 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 45 1308 41709 4152
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
329 Bousquin
112 Justin Bousquin
9 Cristina Mullin
2 Romain Caneill
2 cristinamullin
1 Mullin
1 Timothy Hodson
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1086
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
The fqar package: R tools for analyzing floristic quality assessment data
Submitting author: @equitable-equations
Handling editor: @mikemahoney218 (Active)
Reviewers: @ifoxfoot, @mhesselbarth
Similarity score: 0.7196
tidyhydat: Extract and Tidy Canadian Hydrometric Data
Submitting author: @boshek
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.7089
tbeptools: An R package for synthesizing estuarine data for environmental research
Submitting author: @fawda123
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @paleolimbot, @richardsc
Similarity score: 0.6941
tidyqpcr: Quantitative PCR analysis in the tidyverse.
Submitting author: @ewallace
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6937
HyRiver: Hydroclimate Data Retriever
Submitting author: @cheginit
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @raoulcollenteur, @arbennett
Similarity score: 0.6900
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hi @jbousquin and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any).
I see that this has already been reviewed in pyOpenSci
here: https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/157
Hi @kthyng and thank you! From editorialbot that invalid doi was maybe missing a dash (DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2011.00573.x link), and tidy data should be https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i10. I'll work on a PR for those.
Made some minor updates to paper/paper.bib on the branch paper_JOSS. The doi editorialbot identified as invalid did contain the '-' but it wasn't being encoded correctly. Confirmed the doi link works as it should now in the pdf generated by the workflow.
@editorialbot set paper_JOSS as branch
Done! branch is now paper_JOSS
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
The fqar package: R tools for analyzing floristic quality assessment data
Submitting author: @equitable-equations
Handling editor: @mikemahoney218 (Active)
Reviewers: @ifoxfoot, @mhesselbarth
Similarity score: 0.7202
tidyhydat: Extract and Tidy Canadian Hydrometric Data
Submitting author: @boshek
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.7092
tidyqpcr: Quantitative PCR analysis in the tidyverse.
Submitting author: @ewallace
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6947
tbeptools: An R package for synthesizing estuarine data for environmental research
Submitting author: @fawda123
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @paleolimbot, @richardsc
Similarity score: 0.6935
A Framework to Quality Control Oceanographic Data
Submitting author: @castelao
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @jessicaaustin, @evanleeturner
Similarity score: 0.6934
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@jbousquin a few paper comments (still need to read through in detail)
@jbousquin Can you check through your paper? I can also wait and start the review issue before we go into these details if you prefer.
@kthyng have made those changes but have to wait to merge until I’m back in the office next week (should be Tuesday). I will give it another final read through then for any copy edits as well.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jbousquin<!--end-author-handle-- (Justin Bousquin) Repository: https://github.com/USEPA/harmonize-wq Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper_JOSS Version: 0.5.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jbousquin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jbousquin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: