openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
707 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Pythagora: A Python Package for Modeling the Impact of Social Networks on Market Outcomes #7137

Open editorialbot opened 3 weeks ago

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AnnieKLamar<!--end-author-handle-- (Annie K. Lamar) Repository: https://github.com/stwilker/pythagora Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Samuel Forbes

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8091165ad2038a4a4cab0f1f4593ea6f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8091165ad2038a4a4cab0f1f4593ea6f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8091165ad2038a4a4cab0f1f4593ea6f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8091165ad2038a4a4cab0f1f4593ea6f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AnnieKLamar. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AnnieKLamar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

βœ… OK DOIs

- None

🟑 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Social Life of Ancient Markets: Using Formal N...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Toasting Across Empires: Drinking Vessels, Product...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Netlogo
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and functio...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.08 s (686.6 files/s, 243796.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            20           4674             75           6632
JavaScript                       6            578           1411           2488
CSS                              2            338            114           1483
Python                          10            237            728           1166
XML                              7              0              0            309
Markdown                         2             78              0            184
TeX                              1              4              0             30
TOML                             1              2              0             21
YAML                             1              1              4             19
SVG                              6              0              0             16
JSON                             2              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            58           5912           2332          12350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    14  AnnieKLamar
     5  Annie Lamar
     3  Sarah T. Wilker
     2  Annie K. Lamar
editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Paper file info:

πŸ“„ Wordcount for paper.md is 1217

βœ… The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

License info:

🟑 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

pylattica: a package for prototyping lattice models in chemistry and materials science Submitting author: @mcgalcode Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @riesben, @amkrajewski Similarity score: 0.6888

epyc: Computational experiment management in Python Submitting author: @simoninirelland Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active) Reviewers: @zbeekman, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @amritagos Similarity score: 0.6795

EoN (Epidemics on Networks): a fast, flexible Python package for simulation, analytic approximation, and analysis of epidemics on networks Submitting author: @joelmiller Handling editor: @lpantano (Active) Reviewers: @acolum, @pholme, @hagberg Similarity score: 0.6750

PyMarket - A simple library for simulating markets in Python Submitting author: @gus0k Handling editor: @alexhanna (Retired) Reviewers: @igarizio, @taqtiqa-mark Similarity score: 0.6694

Raphtory: The temporal graph engine for Rust and Python Submitting author: @narnolddd Handling editor: @luizirber (Active) Reviewers: @abhishektiwari, @arashbm Similarity score: 0.6595

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

samhforbes commented 3 weeks ago

@AnnieKLamar it's fairly typical for us to check a submission is within scope for a package of that size, so I'll proceed with that now.

samhforbes commented 3 weeks ago

@editorialbot query scope

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

AnnieKLamar commented 2 weeks ago

Hello there, thank you for the above information! Here are a few suggestions of reviewers that would be well suited to evaluate our submission: