Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.33 s (251.2 files/s, 40303.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 26 1091 558 4470
C/C++ Header 27 618 354 2236
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1178 1479
SVG 1 0 0 308
make 4 86 85 162
Markdown 3 31 0 147
TeX 1 11 0 114
Ruby 1 28 12 106
Bourne Shell 2 23 2 71
Nix 2 8 4 63
YAML 2 1 4 33
JSON 9 0 0 32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 83 1897 2197 9221
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
229 Laura Zichi
174 Daniel Barter
28 Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith
28 lzichi
14 Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith, PhD
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 962
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
π‘ License found: Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
Possible reviewers:
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PAPRECA: A parallel hybrid off-lattice kinetic Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics simulator
Submitting author: @sntioudis
Handling editor: @srmnitc (Active)
Reviewers: @liamhuber, @jfaraudo
Similarity score: 0.8010
Excimontec v1.0: An Open-Source Software Tool for Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations of Organic Electronic Devices
Submitting author: @MikeHeiber
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @mdavezac, @Luthaf
Similarity score: 0.7552
Monte Carlo / Dynamic Code (MC/DC): An accelerated Python package for fully transient neutron transport and rapid methods development
Submitting author: @jpmorgan98
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @lewisfish, @szabo137
Similarity score: 0.7497
lattice_mc: A Python Lattice-Gas Monte Carlo Module
Submitting author: @bjmorgan
Handling editor: @labarba (Retired)
Reviewers: @asmit3
Similarity score: 0.7472
kinisi: Bayesian analysis of mass transport from molecular dynamics simulations
Submitting author: @arm61
Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @dengzeyu
Similarity score: 0.7255
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @mbarzegary is now the editor
Hi @Anshuman5, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @ptmerz, @corettialessandro π Considering your field of expertise as well as your experience with JOSS, would any of you be willing to review this submission? As you know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.07159/joss.07159/10.21105.joss.07159.pdf Software: https://github.com/BlauGroup/RNMC
@mbarzegary Yes, I can review this.
@mbarzegary Yes, I can review this.
Hi! Sorry for the late reply. I can also review this one.
Hi, for me it would be a bit complicated right now. Also, maybe you do not need me at this point ;)
@Anshuman5, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @ptmerz, @corettialessandro thank you guys for your replies.
@editorialbot add @Anshuman5 as reviewer
@Anshuman5 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @ptmerz as reviewer
@ptmerz added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer
@lorenzo-rovigatti added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7244.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@espottesmith<!--end-author-handle-- (Evan Spotte-Smith) Repository: https://github.com/BlauGroup/RNMC Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mbarzegary<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @Anshuman5, @ptmerz, @lorenzo-rovigatti Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @espottesmith. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@espottesmith if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: