openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: RNMC: kinetic Monte Carlo implementations for complex reaction networks #7159

Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@espottesmith<!--end-author-handle-- (Evan Spotte-Smith) Repository: https://github.com/BlauGroup/RNMC Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mbarzegary<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @Anshuman5, @ptmerz, @lorenzo-rovigatti Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d071341934be452863d5523edb17413"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d071341934be452863d5523edb17413/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d071341934be452863d5523edb17413/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d071341934be452863d5523edb17413)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @espottesmith. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@espottesmith if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.33 s (251.2 files/s, 40303.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             26           1091            558           4470
C/C++ Header                    27            618            354           2236
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           1178           1479
SVG                              1              0              0            308
make                             4             86             85            162
Markdown                         3             31              0            147
TeX                              1             11              0            114
Ruby                             1             28             12            106
Bourne Shell                     2             23              2             71
Nix                              2              8              4             63
YAML                             2              1              4             33
JSON                             9              0              0             32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            83           1897           2197           9221
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   229  Laura Zichi
   174  Daniel Barter
    28  Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith
    28  lzichi
    14  Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith, PhD
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Paper file info:

πŸ“„ Wordcount for paper.md is 962

βœ… The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

License info:

🟑 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

espottesmith commented 2 months ago

Possible reviewers:

espottesmith commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PAPRECA: A parallel hybrid off-lattice kinetic Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics simulator Submitting author: @sntioudis Handling editor: @srmnitc (Active) Reviewers: @liamhuber, @jfaraudo Similarity score: 0.8010

Excimontec v1.0: An Open-Source Software Tool for Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations of Organic Electronic Devices Submitting author: @MikeHeiber Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active) Reviewers: @mdavezac, @Luthaf Similarity score: 0.7552

Monte Carlo / Dynamic Code (MC/DC): An accelerated Python package for fully transient neutron transport and rapid methods development Submitting author: @jpmorgan98 Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active) Reviewers: @lewisfish, @szabo137 Similarity score: 0.7497

lattice_mc: A Python Lattice-Gas Monte Carlo Module Submitting author: @bjmorgan Handling editor: @labarba (Retired) Reviewers: @asmit3 Similarity score: 0.7472

kinisi: Bayesian analysis of mass transport from molecular dynamics simulations Submitting author: @arm61 Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active) Reviewers: @hmacdope, @dengzeyu Similarity score: 0.7255

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

mbarzegary commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Assigned! @mbarzegary is now the editor

mbarzegary commented 2 months ago

Hi @Anshuman5, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @ptmerz, @corettialessandro πŸ‘‹ Considering your field of expertise as well as your experience with JOSS, would any of you be willing to review this submission? As you know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.07159/joss.07159/10.21105.joss.07159.pdf Software: https://github.com/BlauGroup/RNMC

Anshuman5 commented 2 months ago

@mbarzegary Yes, I can review this.

ptmerz commented 2 months ago

@mbarzegary Yes, I can review this.

lorenzo-rovigatti commented 2 months ago

Hi! Sorry for the late reply. I can also review this one.

corettialessandro commented 2 months ago

Hi, for me it would be a bit complicated right now. Also, maybe you do not need me at this point ;)

mbarzegary commented 1 month ago

@Anshuman5, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @ptmerz, @corettialessandro thank you guys for your replies.

mbarzegary commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot add @Anshuman5 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

@Anshuman5 added to the reviewers list!

mbarzegary commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot add @ptmerz as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

@ptmerz added to the reviewers list!

mbarzegary commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

@lorenzo-rovigatti added to the reviewers list!

mbarzegary commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7244.