Closed editorialbot closed 2 weeks ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (826.3 files/s, 307283.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 11 2546 2638 9642
R 15 261 624 1285
Rmd 8 118 284 198
Markdown 2 40 0 107
YAML 3 22 9 106
CSS 8 29 41 104
TeX 1 8 0 84
Sass 1 4 0 71
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 49 3028 3596 11597
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
74 Isaac Kinley
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 375
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- None
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-d...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: R^2 should not be used to describe behavioral-econ...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1037//0096-3445.128.1.78 may be a valid DOI for title: Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for dela...
- 10.3758/bf03195548 may be a valid DOI for title: Using logistic regression to estimate delay-discou...
- 10.1002/jeab.128 may be a valid DOI for title: Accurate characterization of delay discounting: A ...
- 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 may be a valid DOI for title: Area under the curve as a measure of discounting
- 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.12.011 may be a valid DOI for title: Turning k on its head: Comments on use of an ED50 ...
- 10.3791/53584-v may be a valid DOI for title: Measuring delay discounting in humans using an adj...
- 10.1017/s0033291721002282 may be a valid DOI for title: The problems with delay discounting: A critical re...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Isaac Kinley. Invalid ORCID.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @kinleyid, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (862.0 files/s, 324540.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 11 2546 2638 9642
R 15 261 624 1285
Markdown 3 150 0 592
Rmd 8 118 284 198
YAML 3 22 9 106
CSS 8 29 41 104
TeX 1 8 0 93
Sass 1 4 0 71
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 50 3138 3596 12091
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
76 Isaac Kinley
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 369
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
BCEA: An R Package for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Submitting author: @n8thangreen
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @rowlandseymour, @MikeLydeamore
Similarity score: 0.6941
The psycho Package: an Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science
Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @SachaEpskamp
Similarity score: 0.6885
measr: Bayesian psychometric measurement using Stan
Submitting author: @wjakethompson
Handling editor: @chartgerink (Retired)
Reviewers: @smasongarrison, @Wenchao-Ma, @seandamiandevine
Similarity score: 0.6714
TDLM: An R package for a systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models
Submitting author: @maximelenormand
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @kanishkan91, @MAnalytics
Similarity score: 0.6676
PupillometryR: An R package for preparing and analysing pupillometry data
Submitting author: @samhforbes
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @paulinepalma, @Athanasiamo
Similarity score: 0.6666
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hello, I'd like to add something I forgot to mention in the submission note---in addition to being under review, the paper that used an early version of this software also exists as a preprint that contains a link to said early version: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y2fdh
@editorialbot invite @skanwal as editor
:wave: @skanwal - can you take this one on as editor?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Hi @crvernon - Yes, I can take this one.
@editorialbot assign @skanwal as editor
Thanks @skanwal!
Assigned! @skanwal is now the editor
Hello, just wanted to suggest some reviewers with R + decision making research expertise:
Hello @PessoaP - will you be happy to review this submission?
Hello @bkrayfield, will you be happy to review this submission?
Hello, just popping back in to suggest some more reviewers:
@skanwal I can review the submission.
@editorialbot assign @bkrayfield as reviewer
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot commands
Hello @skanwal, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive
# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
@editorialbot add @bkrayfield as reviewer
@bkrayfield added to the reviewers list!
Hello @mashrur-ayon - will you be happy to review this submission?
Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (990.2 files/s, 326602.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 11 2546 2638 9642
R 18 364 857 1688
Markdown 3 177 0 788
Rmd 15 214 429 273
YAML 4 23 9 109
CSS 8 29 41 104
TeX 1 9 0 104
Sass 1 4 0 71
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 61 3366 3974 12779
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
102 Isaac Kinley
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 377
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
@editorialbot check repository
Re-checking the repository since I made a few changes to it recently!
Hello @mashrur-ayon - pinging again in case you missed the previous notification. Will you be happy to review this submission?
Hello - @marberts - are you able to review this submission for us?
@skanwal Yes, I can review.
@editorialbot add @marberts as reviewer
@marberts added to the reviewers list!
Thanks @bkrayfield and @marberts. I'll create a review issue for this submission.
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7472.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@kinleyid<!--end-author-handle-- (Isaac Kinley) Repository: https://github.com/kinleyid/tempodisco/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@skanwal<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @bkrayfield, @marberts Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @kinleyid. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@kinleyid if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: