search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
707 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: UncertRadio: Software for determining characteristic limits in accordance to DIN EN ISO 11929 for radioactivity measurements #7199

Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@florianober<!--end-author-handle-- (Florian Ober) Repository: https://github.com/OpenBfS/UncertRadio Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: 2.5.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cd580ee1d2dda58267edc892c8430114"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cd580ee1d2dda58267edc892c8430114/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cd580ee1d2dda58267edc892c8430114/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cd580ee1d2dda58267edc892c8430114)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @florianober. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@florianober if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.41 s (318.8 files/s, 487414.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 90                     123          23719          37023         122294
Glade                            1              0            262          15571
Markdown                         3            173              0            547
TeX                              1             32              0            408
CMake                            1             21             15            192
Bourne Shell                     1              3              2             11
INI                              1              1              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           131          23949          37302         139026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   139  Florian Ober
    13  Florian Ober (MRI)
     6  Flo Ober
     3  Ober
     1  Günter Kanisch
     1  Marco Lechner, GeoBoink
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2765

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 1 week ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.31030/2145948 is OK
- 10.31030/1714556 is OK
- 10.1007/s10967-019-06850-w is OK
- 10.1016/j.nima.2003.07.040 is OK
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106543 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.4498961 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.046 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nima.2017.02.093 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01109 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.06.016 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Rapid Simultaneous Determination of 89Sr and 90Sr ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Quantifying Uncertainty in Nuclear Analytical Meas...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Datenanalyse: Mit Statistischen Methoden Und Compu...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum integrierten ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gesetz zum Schutz vor der schädlichen Wirkung ioni...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Verordnung zum Schutz vor der schädlichen Wirkung ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DIN EN ISO 11929-1:2021-11: Bestimmung der charakt...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DIN EN ISO 11929-2:2021-11: Bestimmung der charakt...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DIN EN ISO 11929-3:2021-11: Bestimmung der charakt...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DIN EN ISO 11929-4:2021-06: Bestimmung der charakt...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Rapid Radiochemical Method for Total Radiostrontiu...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GNOME / Glade
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurem...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 1 to t...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An introduction to the GUM and related documents: ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 2 to t...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Maple
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Spreadsheet design and validation for characterist...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fortran 95 function parser
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PLplot

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.3403/30386313 may be a valid DOI for title: Radiation protection instrumentation - Determinati...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Pylinac: Image analysis for routine quality assurance in radiotherapy Submitting author: @jrkerns Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active) Reviewers: @ProfLeao, @SimonBiggs Similarity score: 0.6194

obscura: A modular C++ tool and library for the direct detection of (sub-GeV) dark matter via nuclear and electron recoils Submitting author: @temken Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @rafaelab, @villaa Similarity score: 0.6153

PyMedPhys: A community effort to develop an open, Python-based standard library for medical physics applications Submitting author: @Matthew-Jennings Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @ProfLeao, @gbaltz Similarity score: 0.6149

nrCascadeSim - A simulation tool for nuclear recoil cascades resulting from neutron capture Submitting author: @villaa Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @matthewfeickert, @altavir Similarity score: 0.6109

feign: a Python package to estimate geometric efficiency in passive gamma spectroscopy measurements of nuclear fuel Submitting author: @ezsolti Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired) Reviewers: @kellyrowland, @sskutnik Similarity score: 0.6078

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

arfon commented 1 week ago

@florianober - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

Also, while we wait, please significantly shorten your paper. As a guide, JOSS papers should be around 1000 words.

florianober commented 1 week ago

Hi @arfon , thanks for adding the paper. We'll wait for the editor ;). In the meantime, I'll discuss with my colleagues how we can shorten the paper, as this is already very, very short :)

florianober commented 4 days ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyMedPhys: A community effort to develop an open, Python-based standard library for medical physics applications Submitting author: @Matthew-Jennings Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @ProfLeao, @gbaltz Similarity score: 0.6955

PROFFASTpylot: Running PROFFAST with Python Submitting author: @feldl Handling editor: @rwegener2 (Active) Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom Similarity score: 0.6943

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys Submitting author: @baxmittens Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active) Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4 Similarity score: 0.6890

bfit: A Python Application For Beta-Detected NMR Submitting author: @dfujim Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @nicksisco1932, @jpata Similarity score: 0.6869

OctApps: a library of Octave functions for continuous gravitational-wave data analysis Submitting author: @kwwette Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @stevenrbrandt Similarity score: 0.6802

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.