[PRE REVIEW]: IUCLID-Decoder: Python code to extract the chemical property data for the substances registered under REACH'

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@JulianeGluege<!--end-author-handle-- (Juliane Glüge) Repository: https://github.com/pkoerner6/IUCLID-Decoder Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2dc414ed18db4bf8c4dc90567df19897"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2dc414ed18db4bf8c4dc90567df19897/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2dc414ed18db4bf8c4dc90567df19897/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2dc414ed18db4bf8c4dc90567df19897)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JulianeGluege. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JulianeGluege if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1002/ieam.4714 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0153030 is OK
- 10.1039/D2VA00225F is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: IUCLID6 - REACH Study Results
- No DOI given, and none found for title: REACH Dissemination Platform - Registered Substanc...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Critical insights into data curation and label noi...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.10 s (996.4 files/s, 195102.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XSLT                            28              4              0          17697
Python                           6            188            141           1978
Markdown                         2             36              0             84
XML                             64              0              0             66
TeX                              1              8              0             55
YAML                             2              7              4             49
CSS                              1              1              0             47
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           104            244            145          19976
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    40  Paulina Koerner
    36  JulianeGluege
    32  pkoerner6

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 808

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Project RACCOON: Automated construction of PDB files for polymers and polymer peptide conjugates Submitting author: @moritzobenauer Handling editor: @jromanowska (Active) Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti Similarity score: 0.6910

ELDAM: A Python software for Life Cycle Inventory data management Submitting author: @GustaveCoste Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @konstantinstadler, @romainsacchi Similarity score: 0.6902

Rdataretriever: R Interface to the Data Retriever Submitting author: @henrykironde Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @rmhogervorst, @jsgalan Similarity score: 0.6872

ChemPy: A package useful for chemistry written in Python Submitting author: @bjodah Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active) Reviewers: @bryanwweber Similarity score: 0.6785

DataDepsGenerators.jl: making reusing data easy by automatically generating DataDeps.jl registration code Submitting author: @oxinabox Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @ninjin Similarity score: 0.6758

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@JulianeGluege thanks for your submission to JOSS. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with initial steps.

After looking at the paper and repository I've just triggered a scope review by our editorial board. This is because of the relatively small size and narrow functionality of this work. The scope review will determine if this work conforms to our substantial scholarly effort criterion. The scope review should take about 2 weeks to complete.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@JulianeGluege unfortunately the board has decided this work is not in scope for JOSS due to its small size and limited functionality. We will now proceed to reject this submission.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.