[PRE REVIEW]: FELINE: A tool to detect emission line galaxies in 3d data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@enthusi<!--end-author-handle-- (Martin Wendt) Repository: https://github.com/enthusi/feline Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a575acd1ffab0604de7e26eb83fd9bdc"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a575acd1ffab0604de7e26eb83fd9bdc/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a575acd1ffab0604de7e26eb83fd9bdc/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a575acd1ffab0604de7e26eb83fd9bdc)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @enthusi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@enthusi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629507 is OK
- 10.1117/12.856027 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202244187 is OK
- 10.1002/asna.20220091 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad357 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad3764 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202348725 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: MUSE Commissioning

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (522.3 files/s, 165458.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          19           1455           2899           4091
Markdown                         5            112              0            380
C                                1             60             46            302
CUDA                             1             29             25            200
make                             1             31              4            135
TeX                              1             10              0            134
YAML                             2             14              4             75
Bourne Shell                     1             16             15             67
JSON                             1              0              0             34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32           1727           2993           5418
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   108  osoth
   101  Oskar Soth
    82  marvin
    34  soth1
    20  Martin Wendt
     2  Marvin Henschel
     1  enthusi

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1002

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

disksurf: Extracting the 3D Structure of Protoplanetary Disks Submitting author: @richteague Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @emptymalei, @cpinte Similarity score: 0.7196

Astronomical échelle spectroscopy data analysis with muler Submitting author: @gully Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active) Reviewers: @bmorris3, @wtgee Similarity score: 0.7183

special: A Python package for the spectral characterization of directly imaged low-mass companions Submitting author: @VChristiaens Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @QuentChangeat, @jgagneastro Similarity score: 0.7167

FASMA 2.0: A Python package for stellar parameters and chemical abundances Submitting author: @MariaTsantaki Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active) Reviewers: @warrickball, @ipelupessy Similarity score: 0.7122

popkinmocks: mock IFU datacubes for modelling stellar populations and kinematics Submitting author: @prashjet Handling editor: @plaplant (Active) Reviewers: @apoudel2014, @Jammy2211 Similarity score: 0.7114

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[dfm]

@enthusi — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!