[PRE REVIEW]: PiNNAcLe: Adaptive Learn-On-The-Fly Algorithm for Machine-Learning Potential

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@yqshao<!--end-author-handle-- (Yunqi Shao) Repository: https://github.com/Teoroo-CMC/PiNNAcLe Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v0.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/247b8c81ba44d96032dde7f83abf1940"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/247b8c81ba44d96032dde7f83abf1940/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/247b8c81ba44d96032dde7f83abf1940/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/247b8c81ba44d96032dde7f83abf1940)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @yqshao. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@yqshao if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.175503 is OK
- 10.1002/qua.24890 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096405 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.1039/c7sc02267k is OK
- 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e is OK
- 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5023802 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5051772 is OK
- 10.1103/physrevb.100.014105 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5143190 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0007045 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0016004 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00994 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107206 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0070931 is OK
- 10.1088/2632-2153/abe294 is OK
- 10.1039/d2sc04056e is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1849.2 files/s, 121445.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                        19            256              0            825
SVG                              1              0              0            577
TeX                              5             27              5            483
YAML                             6             12              2            176
Dockerfile                       3              1              0             22
JavaScript                       1              1              0             15
Jinja Template                   1              5              0             12
Python                           1              1              0             10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            37            303              7           2120
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    89  Yunqi Shao

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1029

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

nap: A molecular dynamics package with parameter-optimization programs for classical and machine-learning potentials Submitting author: @ryokbys Handling editor: @usethedata (Retired) Reviewers: @richardjgowers, @foeroyingur Similarity score: 0.7667

calorine: A Python package for constructing and sampling neuroevolution potential models Submitting author: @elindgren Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @Chronum94, @naik-aakash Similarity score: 0.7459

FitSNAP: Atomistic machine learning with LAMMPS Submitting author: @rohskopf Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active) Reviewers: @tpurcell90, @bahung Similarity score: 0.7360

HOOMD-TF: GPU-Accelerated, Online Machine Learning in the HOOMD-blue Molecular Dynamics Engine Submitting author: @RainierBarrett Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @malramsay64, @rmeli Similarity score: 0.7344

SISSO++: A C++ Implementation of the Sure-Independence Screening and Sparsifying Operator Approach Submitting author: @tpurcell90 Handling editor: @jarvist (Retired) Reviewers: @ml-evs, @AstroBarker Similarity score: 0.7259

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.