Open editorialbot opened 1 day ago
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1145/192115.192124 is OK
- 10.1137/S0036144504446096 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02564 is OK
- 10.1007/s00158-011-0666-3 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A software package for sequential quadratic progra...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A MODular development environment and library for ...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1168.4 files/s, 221031.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 14 405 817 1604
Fortran 77 1 384 691 1115
Markdown 14 191 0 814
TeX 4 92 49 659
YAML 5 58 105 247
Jupyter Notebook 2 0 1021 75
TOML 1 8 13 65
Meson 2 8 3 34
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 45 1158 2707 4648
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
34 anugrahjoPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2707
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago License info:
✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)
prashjha
commented
1 day ago Dear @hariharanragothaman and @saaikrishnan, please read the first couple of comments in this thread and create your review checklist. You can read the reviewer guidelines here. Also, you can browse the closed "REVIEW" issues on the "joss-reviews" repository to get some ideas on how to complete the reviews. Good luck!
hariharanragothaman
commented
1 day ago @prashjha Thanks a lot for the suggestions and guidelines! Will do the needful! ✅
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@anugrahjo<!--end-author-handle-- (Anugrah Jo Joshy) Repository: https://github.com/anugrahjo/PySLSQP Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@prashjha<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @hariharanragothaman, @saaikrishnan Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@hariharanragothaman & @saaikrishnan, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @prashjha know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@hariharanragothaman, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist@saaikrishnan, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist