openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
709 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: easyCHEM: A Python package for calculating chemical equilibrium abundances in exoplanet atmospheres #7257

Open editorialbot opened 3 days ago

editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mauricemolli<!--end-author-handle-- (Paul Mollière) Repository: https://gitlab.com/EliseLei/easychem Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 2.0.6 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mauricemolli. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mauricemolli if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 3 days ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629800 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95be is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202449328 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202348508 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad3515 is OK
- 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/4 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemic...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (590.3 files/s, 253477.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 90                       1            321            930           2914
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            783            599
Python                           3            142            196            393
TeX                              1              9              0            112
reStructuredText                 3             69             43             91
Markdown                         2             17              4             71
Meson                            2             12              8             59
TOML                             1              4              2             48
YAML                             1              4             11             10
make                             1              4              6              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            16            582           1983           4306
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    51  mauricemollie
    15  mauricemolli
    14  EliseLei
editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 517

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 3 days ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

dfm commented 3 days ago

@mauricemolli — Thanks for your submission and sorry for the delay getting this started! Somehow this ended up in a different "track" and slipped through the cracks.

Unfortunately, all the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

editorialbot commented 3 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

pyEQUIB Python Package, an addendum to proEQUIB: IDL Library for Plasma Diagnostics and Abundance Analysis Submitting author: @danehkar Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @arfon Similarity score: 0.7510

ExoTETHyS: Tools for Exoplanetary Transits around host stars Submitting author: @gmorello Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @steven-murray, @williamjameshandley Similarity score: 0.7471

POSEIDON: A Multidimensional Atmospheric Retrieval Code for Exoplanet Spectra Submitting author: @MartianColonist Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @ideasrule, @LorenzoMugnai Similarity score: 0.7328

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars Submitting author: @s-goldman Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey Similarity score: 0.7297

3D Line Radiative Transfer & Synthetic Observations with Magritte Submitting author: @FredDeCeuster Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active) Reviewers: @gonsie, @CFGrote Similarity score: 0.7279

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

mauricemolli commented 1 day ago

Hi @dfm , no worries, I had tentatively planned to check in with you to ask about it, but great that things are underway now. Below a list of potential reviewers. As far as I can see non of them have reviewed for JOSS before though: