[PRE REVIEW]: J-UBIK: The JAX-accelerated Universal Bayesian Imaging Kit

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@wmarg<!--end-author-handle-- (Margret Westerkamp) Repository: https://github.com/NIFTy-PPL/J-UBIK Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: 0.2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/23846ab05ad4f077dc9a26514652c6ec"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/23846ab05ad4f077dc9a26514652c6ec/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/23846ab05ad4f077dc9a26514652c6ec/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/23846ab05ad4f077dc9a26514652c6ec)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wmarg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wmarg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.06593 is OK
- 10.1063/1.4819999 is OK
- 10.1002/andp.201800290 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201321236 is OK
- 10.3390/e23070853 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202347750 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202243819 is OK
- 10.1038/s41550-021-01548-0 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202346851 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2406.09144 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202140486 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2304.12350 is OK
- 10.3390/e25040652 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Nifty5: Numerical information field theory v5
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Metric Gaussian Variational Inference

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.08 s (960.1 files/s, 150057.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          65           1688           3983           5262
YAML                             5             40            112            369
Markdown                         2             37              0            230
TeX                              1             19              0            192
TOML                             1              5              0             61
reStructuredText                 2              9              4              7
Bourne Shell                     1              4              6              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            77           1802           4105           6127
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   635  Vincent Eberle
   314  wmarg
   296  matteani
   111  veberle
    75  Philipp Frank
    25  Julian Ruestig
     3  Torsten Ensslin
     2  Julia Stadler
     1  Matteo Guardiani

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1388

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[dfm]

@wmarg — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Comrade: Composable Modeling of Radio Emission Submitting author: @ptiede Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @mileslucas, @cescalara Similarity score: 0.7139

Anime: Atmospheric and Instrument Models in the Measurement Equation Submitting author: @iniyannatarajan Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @kiranshila, @michael-petersen Similarity score: 0.7121

Bayesian X-ray Analysis (BXA) v4.0 Submitting author: @JohannesBuchner Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @cescalara, @cescalara, @grburgess Similarity score: 0.7102

Eureka!: An End-to-End Pipeline for JWST Time-Series Observations Submitting author: @taylorbell57 Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @catrionamurray, @christinahedges, @dfm Similarity score: 0.7009

PyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & Morphology Submitting author: @Jammy2211 Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired) Reviewers: @alexandergagliano, @sloneil Similarity score: 0.6926

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.