openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: AGNI: A radiative-convective model for lava planet atmospheres #7259

Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@nichollsh<!--end-author-handle-- (Harrison Nicholls) Repository: https://github.com/nichollsh/AGNI Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.8.3 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/380d8e608e9f863b639af76ceebc7131"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/380d8e608e9f863b639af76ceebc7131/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/380d8e608e9f863b639af76ceebc7131/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/380d8e608e9f863b639af76ceebc7131)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nichollsh. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@nichollsh if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.08 s (713.6 files/s, 265664.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           15           1301           1444           4387
Jupyter Notebook                10              0           9734           1216
TeX                              2             94              0            951
Markdown                         9            108              0            385
TOML                             7             37              7            322
Bourne Shell                     3             44             30            161
YAML                             3             17             11            104
SVG                              3              1              3             78
JSON                             2              0              0             30
CSS                              1              1              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            55           1603          11229           7643
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   509  Harrison Nicholls
     2  Hamish
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

πŸ“„ Wordcount for paper.md is 1098

βœ… The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

🟑 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 1 month ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

βœ… OK DOIs

- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/56 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629322 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201323169 is OK
- 10.1029/90jd01945 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06258-3 is OK
- 10.1029/2020JE006711 is OK
- 10.3847/PSJ/ac2580 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202245521 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201628799 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa2300 is OK
- 10.3390/galaxies11030075 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04386 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04057 is OK
- 10.1007/s11214-023-00995-7 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09284 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/aa784f is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acdef2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-020-67751-7 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad2486 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.abd1387 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1345 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.12190852 is OK
- 10.1017/9781316148549 is OK

🟑 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: SOCRATES Technical Guide: Suite Of Community RAdia...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Principles of planetary climate
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Exoplanet Handbook

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GeophysicalFlows.jl: Solvers for geophysical fluid dynamics problems in periodic domains on CPUs & GPUs Submitting author: @navidcy Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active) Reviewers: @ranocha, @eviatarbach Similarity score: 0.7493

3D Line Radiative Transfer & Synthetic Observations with Magritte Submitting author: @FredDeCeuster Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active) Reviewers: @gonsie, @CFGrote Similarity score: 0.7400

SWAMPE: A Shallow-Water Atmospheric Model in Python for Exoplanets Submitting author: @kathlandgren Handling editor: @dfm (Active) Reviewers: @mark-hammond, @imalsky Similarity score: 0.7390

Oceananigans.jl: Fast and friendly geophysical fluid dynamics on GPUs Submitting author: @ali-ramadhan Handling editor: @kthyng (Active) Reviewers: @funsim, @mancellin Similarity score: 0.7154

PROFFASTpylot: Running PROFFAST with Python Submitting author: @feldl Handling editor: @rwegener2 (Active) Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom Similarity score: 0.7145

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

dfm commented 1 month ago

@nichollsh β€” Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!