Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.33 s (1382.6 files/s, 246513.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 193 5424 579 47362
Python 45 2249 4040 13264
SVG 5 0 0 2698
CSS 12 307 92 1793
JavaScript 18 185 283 1203
reStructuredText 178 610 833 546
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 454 100
YAML 3 14 10 80
TeX 1 9 0 79
TOML 1 6 0 46
Markdown 3 18 0 35
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 462 8834 6299 67241
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
22 BodeTobias
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- None
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy pr...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Efficient and modular implicit differentiation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Flax: A neural network library and ecosystem for J...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Equinox: neural networks in JAX via callable PyTre...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PETSc users manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with bui...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: 36-paraview: An end-user tool for large-data visua...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Automation of Finite Element Methods
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/s0167-739x(03)00188-2 may be a valid DOI for title: Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equat...
- 10.21105/joss.01450 may be a valid DOI for title: PyVista: 3D plotting and mesh analysis through a s...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 451
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
scikit-finite-diff, a new tool for PDE solving
Submitting author: @celliern
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @mrava87, @poulson
Similarity score: 0.7185
py-pde: A Python package for solving partial differential equations
Submitting author: @david-zwicker
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @celliern, @mstimberg
Similarity score: 0.7157
SGMCMCJax: a lightweight JAX library for stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms
Submitting author: @jeremiecoullon
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @canyon289, @ColCarroll
Similarity score: 0.7081
Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations
Submitting author: @stammler
Handling editor: @taless474 (Retired)
Reviewers: @schruste, @lucaferranti
Similarity score: 0.7067
PyGDH: Python Grid Discretization Helper
Submitting author: @kfhiga
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @JamieJQuinn, @zhaowei0566
Similarity score: 0.7047
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @BodeTobias - Thanks for your submission. I will assign myself to be the editor.
Please suggest ~5 potential reviewers. You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. Or people who aren't in the JOSS system would also be ok. If you know their GitHub usernames, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @).
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor
Dear @danielskatz, thank you for being the editor for my submission! I think the authors and reviewers of the first two similar JOSS papers could be a good fit. The first two of the following list I also found in the list of reviewers:
mrava87 celliern poulson dawid-zwicker mstimberg
👋 @celliern, @mrava87, @poulson, @david-zwicker, @mrava87 - Would a couple of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
I'm extremely busy in October, but I could do a review in November if that's not too late.
@david-zwicker - thanks - let me see what other responses I get
👋 @Sm00thix, @parmentelat, @basileMarchand - Would any of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
👋 @jeremiecoullon, @canyon289, @ColCarroll - Would any of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?
Hello! I'm not working on pde since a while, so it may be better if other deal with the review. But if there is no other reviewer I could do it.
Hello! Although the topic is very interesting, I am not currently able to accept the invite due to high workload.
Hello! I don't know a lot about PDE solvers, and I have a high workflow at the moment so I can't help with this unfortunately. :(
Hi! Thanks for considering me. Unfortunately, I have a high workload for the rest of the year so I will have to decline.
@celliern - I'm going to go ahead and add you, while I continue to look for another review. Thanks for "volunteering"...
@editorialbot add @celliern as reviewer
@celliern added to the reviewers list!
Hello, @danielskatz I'm interested in the topic. I'm up for taking part in the review.
Thanks @basileMarchand - I'll add you in the system, but keep waiting a little to start the review, as I would like to get three reviewers if I can
@editorialbot add @basileMarchand as reviewer
@basileMarchand added to the reviewers list!
hello @danielskatz thanks for the invitation, but I have very little to do with pde's so this is definitely very far from my comfort area, and I will have to decline, but thanks again
@celliern - I'm going to go ahead and add you, while I continue to look for another review. Thanks for "volunteering"...
it's ok, my pde times are not that far away, and I can spare some evening doing the review :)
Thanks - with @celliern's nice comment, I'm going to go ahead and start the review now
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7300.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@BodeTobias<!--end-author-handle-- (Tobias Bode) Repository: https://github.com/BodeTobias/AutoPDEx Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @celliern, @basileMarchand Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @BodeTobias. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@BodeTobias if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: