Open editorialbot opened 2 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.future.2023.12.026 is OK
- 10.1145/2934664 is OK
- 10.1145/3472883.3486982 is OK
- 10.1145/3514221.3526054 is OK
- 10.1007/s11192-020-03726-9 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7196590 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dagster | Cloud-native Orchestration of Data Pipel...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cost efficient alternative to databricks lock-in
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (986.8 files/s, 128171.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 29 568 416 3557
Markdown 3 126 0 442
TOML 4 27 2 128
TeX 1 1 0 103
make 1 6 21 51
JSON 4 0 0 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 42 728 439 4288
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
24 geoHeil
9 Georg Heiler
8 HPicatto
2 Hernan
1 CI Hotfix
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 2025
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.6596
fseval: A Benchmarking Framework for Feature Selection and Feature Ranking Algorithms
Submitting author: @dunnkers
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @mcasl, @estefaniatalavera
Similarity score: 0.6578
EspressoDB: A scientific database for managing high-performance computing workflows
Submitting author: @ckoerber
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @remram44, @ixjlyons
Similarity score: 0.6475
SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage
Submitting author: @wathom
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @aturner-epcc, @phargogh
Similarity score: 0.6428
strucscan: A lightweight Python-based framework for high-throughput material simulation
Submitting author: @thohamm
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @mturiansky, @wcwitt
Similarity score: 0.6416
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @HPicatto - thanks for your submission.
Before we proceed, there are a few items that need updating:
@editorialbot check repository
to run some checks, one of which calculates the word count of the paper. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.Once these changes are made, please ping me and we can get the review started.
Hi @danielskatz, We have finished resizing the content in an internal branch, and we moved two sections into .md files. Could you guide us on how we should reference these sections within the main Markdown file so that they are properly linked in the paper? Should we use the final GitHub URL, or is there a specific way that JOSS handles appendices or external references? Thank you for your help!
JOSS does not consider these appendices, but they are external references, so you can just use URLs to them, saying that they are in the GitHub repo
Hi @danielskatz we updated main, could you please give us new feedback
@HPicatto - All the commands I'm now going to run to check the length of the paper, check references, and regenerate the paper are all commands you can run too. Note that editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
@editorialbot check repository
@editorialbot check references
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (992.2 files/s, 124633.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 31 585 427 3606
Markdown 3 126 0 442
TOML 4 27 1 124
TeX 1 1 0 103
make 1 6 21 51
JSON 4 0 0 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 44 745 449 4333
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
26 geoHeil
9 Georg Heiler
8 HPicatto
2 CI Hotfix
2 Hernan
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 2025
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.future.2023.12.026 is OK
- 10.1145/2934664 is OK
- 10.1145/3472883.3486982 is OK
- 10.1145/3514221.3526054 is OK
- 10.1007/s11192-020-03726-9 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7196590 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dagster | Cloud-native Orchestration of Data Pipel...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cost efficient alternative to databricks lock-in
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.6595
fseval: A Benchmarking Framework for Feature Selection and Feature Ranking Algorithms
Submitting author: @dunnkers
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @mcasl, @estefaniatalavera
Similarity score: 0.6576
EspressoDB: A scientific database for managing high-performance computing workflows
Submitting author: @ckoerber
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @remram44, @ixjlyons
Similarity score: 0.6474
SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage
Submitting author: @wathom
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @aturner-epcc, @phargogh
Similarity score: 0.6427
strucscan: A lightweight Python-based framework for high-throughput material simulation
Submitting author: @thohamm
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @mturiansky, @wcwitt
Similarity score: 0.6414
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@HPicatto - One issue is that the paper still appears to be twice a long as JOSS recommends. As I skim it, the Implementation Challenges section seems to not really fit JOSS's model, though if this was a paper in another venue about the process of developing the software, it would make sense. That's the only section I would suggest removing, and without it, I would be ok going ahead with the review even if the paper was still a bit long.
Another minor issue is that we don't need your mailing addresses in your affiliations - just institution and country is enough, along with unit (e.g. department, division, etc.) if you want.
Thanks for the progress!
@editorialbot check repository
@editorialbot check references
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1090.3 files/s, 131612.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 31 585 427 3606
Markdown 5 133 0 463
TOML 4 27 1 124
TeX 1 1 0 101
make 1 6 21 51
JSON 4 0 0 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 46 752 449 4352
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
26 geoHeil
9 Georg Heiler
9 HPicatto
3 CI Hotfix
2 Hernan
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.future.2023.12.026 is OK
- 10.1145/2934664 is OK
- 10.1145/3472883.3486982 is OK
- 10.1145/3514221.3526054 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7196590 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dagster | Cloud-native Orchestration of Data Pipel...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cost efficient alternative to databricks lock-in
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/s11192-020-03726-9 may be a valid DOI for title: Web mining for innovation ecosystem mapping: a fra...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1300
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
Hi @danielskatz new version is here, now the extension is 1300 words, do you think it's acceptable? it's not easy to keep reducing the length
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PyDGN: a Python Library for Flexible and Reproducible Research on Deep Learning for Graphs
Submitting author: @diningphil
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @sepandhaghighi
Similarity score: 0.6405
strucscan: A lightweight Python-based framework for high-throughput material simulation
Submitting author: @thohamm
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @mturiansky, @wcwitt
Similarity score: 0.6393
Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures
Submitting author: @rico-berner
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @zhaozhang, @gflofst
Similarity score: 0.6366
DASF: A data analytics software framework for distributed environments
Submitting author: @d-eggert
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @cjwu, @pritchardn
Similarity score: 0.6353
CM++ - A Meta-method for Well-Connected Community Detection
Submitting author: @chackoge
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @LuisScoccola, @chryswoods
Similarity score: 0.6330
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@HPicatto - sorry I missed your note above. Yes, I think this length is fine. Can you also add the missing DOI that editorialbot found in your .bib file, then please recheck the references and regenerate the pdf? I will mark this as unpaused, but will need to wait until I can find an editor with capacity to take this on.
👋 @HaoZeke - it looks like one of your edited submissions is just about done - would you be able to take on this one?
@editorialbot invite @HaoZeke as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
👋 @hugoledoux - While I finish accepting another of your edited submissions, I wonder if you would be willing to become the editor for this one?
@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Hi @danielskatz I will be able to edit this, with the caveat being I will not be able to start soliciting reviews until the weekend / Monday morning. If that's alright I'll go ahead and assign myself
Thanks @HaoZeke - that would be great!
@editorialbot assign @HaoZeke as editor
Assigned! @HaoZeke is now the editor
@editorialbot remind @HaoZeke in 3 days
Reminder set for @HaoZeke in 3 days
:wave: @HaoZeke, please take a look at the state of the submission (this is an automated reminder).
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.future.2023.12.026 is OK
- 10.1145/2934664 is OK
- 10.1145/3472883.3486982 is OK
- 10.1145/3514221.3526054 is OK
- 10.1007/s11192-020-03726-9 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7196590 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dagster | Cloud-native Orchestration of Data Pipel...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cost efficient alternative to databricks lock-in
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Hi, is it possible to have any update on this?
hi @d-eggert @rico-berner 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers? I was hoping to have your insights because of your past authorship of related JOSS publications.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@HPicatto<!--end-author-handle-- (Hernan Picatto) Repository: https://github.com/ascii-supply-networks/ascii-hydra Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@HaoZeke<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @HPicatto. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@HPicatto if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: