openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
712 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: flory: A Python package for finding coexisting phases in multicomponent mixtures #7304

Open editorialbot opened 2 hours ago

editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@qiangyicheng<!--end-author-handle-- (Yicheng Qiang) Repository: https://github.com/qiangyicheng/flory Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.2.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e95e55e086acf4c019e8f3854e048dac"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e95e55e086acf4c019e8f3854e048dac/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e95e55e086acf4c019e8f3854e048dac/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e95e55e086acf4c019e8f3854e048dac)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @qiangyicheng. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@qiangyicheng if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 hours ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 is OK
- 10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00198 is OK
- 10.1145/2833157.2833162 is OK
- 10.1039/C8SM02045K is OK
- 10.1039/C3SM51893K is OK
- 10.5334/jors.140 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-011-0065-6_11 is OK
- 10.1088/0953-8984/10/37/002 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.2108551118 is OK
- 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.029 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.2201250119 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Computational Thermodynamics: The Calphad Method
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scaling of Phase Count in Multicomponent Liquids
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific C...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (1354.6 files/s, 141430.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          53           1126           2175           2790
TeX                              3             45              0            396
Markdown                         3             74              0            241
reStructuredText                 7            130            338            230
YAML                             5             25             22            154
TOML                             1             14              0             85
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             2             11              9             23
CSS                              1              3              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            76           1436           2545           3954
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   143  Yicheng Qiang
    47  Yicheng Qiang (强 宜澄)
    30  David Zwicker
editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1039

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

kyleniemeyer commented 2 hours ago

@editorialbot invite @srmnitc as editor

editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 2 hours ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

AmpTorch: A Python package for scalable fingerprint-based neural network training on multi-element systems with integrated uncertainty quantification Submitting author: @ajmedford Handling editor: @dhhagan (Retired) Reviewers: @ml-evs, @ianfhunter Similarity score: 0.7276

OpenTerrace: A fast, flexible and extendable Python framework for thermal energy storage packed bed simulations Submitting author: @jakobhaervig Handling editor: @AdamRJensen (Active) Reviewers: @baperry2, @AdamRJensen Similarity score: 0.7254

SurfinPy 2.0: A Phase Diagram Generator for Surfaces and Bulk Phases Submitting author: @jstse Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @awvwgk, @dandavies99 Similarity score: 0.7224

Bluebonnet: Scaling solutions for production analysis from unconventional oil and gas wells Submitting author: @frank1010111 Handling editor: @matthewfeickert (Active) Reviewers: @AnantHariharan1996, @RyanSwindeman Similarity score: 0.7196

physical_validation: A Python package to assess the physical validity of molecular simulation results Submitting author: @ptmerz Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active) Reviewers: @tonigi, @geraldjwang, @zadehsey Similarity score: 0.7168

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.