Open editorialbot opened 4 days ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112311 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00236 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-021-01954-6 is OK
- 10.1111/jiec.12825 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118614 is OK
- 10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/aa914d is OK
- 10.1021/acs.est.5b01558 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 is OK
- 10.1016/j.spc.2018.07.001 is OK
- 10.18174/sesmo.18155 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00097 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- None
β MISSING DOIs
- None
β INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=2.18 s (33.0 files/s, 46160.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML 16 45 45 86023
Python 22 765 774 2991
JSON 2 0 0 1861
Jupyter Notebook 12 0 6262 1308
Markdown 2 111 0 276
TeX 1 13 0 165
CSV 14 0 0 114
Bourne Shell 2 2 20 10
INI 1 0 0 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 72 936 7101 92752
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
242 romainsacchi
32 alvarojhahn
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1122
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@romainsacchi : Could you check the invalid DOI (see above)?
@fraukewiese Done!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@romainsacchi<!--end-author-handle-- (Romain Sacchi) Repository: https://github.com/polca/pathways Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@fraukewiese<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @kcerva, @marc-vdm Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@kcerva & @marc-vdm, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @fraukewiese know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
@kcerva, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
@marc-vdm, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist